Comentários de Rioters
Tomoe Gozen (EUNE)
: Not like Zed and Jhin don't exploit the AD bonus from Janna's shield already. They scale off their % total AD (Zed from his W, Jhin from his passive). So they get a lot more AD than Janna initially provides.
It’s been months since Zed lost his % scaling, both from ult (the steal mechanic) and W.
Seriphos (EUW)
: Doublelift gets his Payback
I’m out of the loop because I don’t watch interviews and stuff like that, but at this point I guess I’m not the only one that doesn’t get the DL hype. Nothing personal of course but he has that “I’m so good” aura that makes him unlikeable, at least for me.
: If Swain ignored her, he'd be dead. Swain keeps her close because he believes in his ability to manage the challenge. And, LeBlanc and Swain intrigue each other. It's only hinted at in his backstory, but Swain killed LeBlanc with his own hand during a high society waltz... only for her to reappear again. This could scare him. This could enrage him. Or it could intrigue him. So to repeat, LeBlanc and Swain intrigue each other. Among many other things.
: Bring Us Your Bugs!! Celebrating 10 Years of LoL
I have some for you: When LeBlanc casts W-R and quickly goes back to one of her pads, sometimes it happens to go back to the wrong pad. It’s been out for some patches now and many people on r/leblancmains shared the same experience. I don’t know how to reproduce it or informations to reproduce it unfortunately. When Vlad casts Q on a dying target, sometimes Q goes on cooldown even though it did not deal damage nor heal Vladimir. As for TFT, I am NEVER able to pick a champion from the first carousel. The game just freezes until the first minions round is over and also gives me a brief “attempting to reconnect” message.
: Ask me anything!! (About narrative (for Warwick, Urgot, Swain, Nunu & Willump, and Pantheon (VGUs)))
A question about Swain and Noxus in general: why does Swain ignore the fact that LeBlanc is (heavily implied) to be part of the Trifarix? I mean, she’s consistently trying to depose Swain, so why does he just straight up ignore her?
Sylaelque (EUW)
: Maybe her W and R range should be lowered a bit more but {{champion:145}} isn't op as much as {{champion:222}} .
Her abilities’ range isn’t even the issue with her. The fact that she’s so safe while also being able to build any defensive item is the reason I personally can’t stand her.
Comentários de Rioters
: | TFT | Delay in loading, The first Carousel is always late! He doesn't have time to pick!
I have the exact same issue and I’ve had it since TFT got released. Riot acknowledged this issue and said they were working on a fix, alas still no news about it 4 months later.
: Post in question for those wondering: https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/gameplay-balance/ApIZIVkn-lol-riots-reason-for-gutting-all-the-tanks-champions-is-because-they-are-low-lethality-for-lcs Correction in question for those wondering: > [{quoted}](name=Academy Kayn,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=ApIZIVkn,comment-id=000b,timestamp=2019-10-05T09:04:39.616+0000) > > Assuming this is what you're going off of, you're completely misinterpreting the context of it. When they say low-lethality, they don't mean "people who have low kill potential", because their example is Tahm Kench, a tank whose had no issue killing folk these last few patches. They're talking about Low lethality in terms of "They actively stop plays too easily", leading to points where mistakes can't be punished. Once again, Tahm Kench is the example here, a champion whose been an issue in the past due to too easily negating plays and picks with his Devour. > > Worlds is a spectacle event, no one wants to spend hours watching nothing happen, and then one fight decides the game. Riot's quote isn't even saying "Low Lethality champions", it specifically says "Low Lethality Metas", meaning, games where nothing happens. Tanks are anything but low lethality, because they are active play makers, making picks and engaging fights. They are everything that Riot wants with worlds, people actively picking fights. > > What Riot doesn't want, are games where nothing happens, because no ones mistakes can be punished.
I could’t agree more with everything the guy said. While I agree that it sucks seeing your favorite champion get nerfed multiple times in a row, I think that people need to realize that stopping plays with little to no effort involved is not healthy and not fun to watch. I’m not a big pro play fan, but I fail to understand why many people here don’t understand that this is why many tanks get nerfed for pro play’s sake. Riot doesn’t hate tank players, they hate how easily tanks prevent things from happening.
Nithke (EUW)
: Idk bout higher elos but in high silver she's pretty shit, might sound selfish but i don't want them to nerf her because I like playing her, if they nerf her she'll still be good in high elos (because the problem is her kit, not stats) but she'll be bad in lower elos I just hope they can find a solution to nerf her teamfight and buff her laning phase
Riven is already broken in laning phase, no lane buffs thanks. On a side note, Riven is not bad in lower elos per se after nerfs, it’s low elo people that can’t play her properly. Tbh, it’s just better to get good at the champion while it’s “weak” rather than abusing it while it’s broken and then complain about nerfs.
: Have you looked at her numbers? They're similar or better than Annie's and Annie can still 1 shot. Literally...just land E2.
Annie has much higher ratios than LeBlanc tho. Her Q ratio was nerfed by 20% a couple patches ago and her W got nerfed by 10 base damage. I know that these numbers don’t look that high, but they hit her really hard.
: Have you tried landing her E? The reason people suck with leblanc is because they want to be able to just QW spam because E takes the tiniest amount of effort. There's a reason they made it so you can't get a kill without E2 and some form of R. They reverted her to her old, toxic kit.
If you bothered playing 1 game as LeBlanc you would understand why she sucks right now. QRE doesn't kill shit anymore and that's how LeBlanc has always worked. All of her burst has been tied to her landing a skillshot (chain) after the revert but they nerfed her numbers so hard that you can't kill people anymore with that unless you are insanely fed.
: Mundo doesn't need buffs. Leblanc doesn't need buffs. Ekko doesn't need buffs. Lux doesn't need buffs.
LeBlanc is trash. Literally the only assassin that can’t kill people unless 15/0. 46% WR and 3.8% pickrate btw.
: that...sounds more like boosting unless they changed their entire playstyle for the game
I don't think it's boosting tbh. He has played different champs lately but whenever he picks Riven he basically ends up winning. Honestly I think people can improve at the game, and that's for sure, but if after 5 season you never get out of Plat and suddenly you start playing one of the most boosted champions in the game rn and get to almost-master then it means the champ itself has major issues.
Rylalei (EUNE)
: Video or didn't happen.
I don't have a video, but you can check for yourself [here](https://euw.op.gg/summoner/userName=capo+sun)
: Riven isnt just a problem in the NA servers
There’s a guy in my friend list that has been hardstuck P4 for seasons. This season he magically got to D2 one tricking Riven and maintaining a 63% WR with her over more than 200 games. I can’t link his op.gg, but hey that’s how good Riven has been this season. Literal definition of free elo.
Crocele (NA)
: just like playing grasp swain :)
Yeah that’s nasty against melees toplane lol but I really miss Phase Rush and/or nimbus cloak when going Resolve.
Crocele (NA)
: revitalize or overgrowth on swain?
Not sure why you would go Resolve, but overgrowth sucks and revitalize is probably better because it increases your passive and ult heals.
: And his entire kit is dodgeable so long as you can eyeball.
His autos aren’t. And his Q is on a less-than-2-seconds cd. So yeah, it’s like I only have to care about him and his abilities all game.
Comentários de Rioters
: No, he did in fact take part in all of those reworks. He was completely responsible for the akali mini rework and he was the one who designed much of the rengar mini rework (with the weird Q). He was, in fact, fired. Just because the way it was done was a fancy forced resignation doesn’t mean he left willingly. He had caused too much commotion and too much anger and crossed too many boundaries with the words he used. He was unprofessional and Riot had actually “warned” him a few times prior, but he crossed the line a few too many times and was forced to leave. Many firms, especially in software development and the like, do _not_ like using the term “fire.”
Again, I’m pretty sure that Swimgar was made by Repertoir. Also as far as I remember, he was always polite on Twitter when asked about the bullshit changes he came up with. You’re probably mistaking him for DanielZKlein.
: Good question. It had a lot to do with him insulting players on twitter, an odd SJW type of behavior, refusal to communicate with mains or players of champions he was working on while joking about them. He was responsible for the Rengar rework, the Leblanc Rework, the Akali mini rework, a lot of work on Karma, and a few others, but those three are by far his most notable. The bias was obvious. He also worked on Ahri and I remember that he had *THREE* potential mini reworks for her that they said they wanted to see what Ahri players thought of. The Leblanc, Rengar, and Akali changes just appeared and were pushed despite nobody wanting them/thinking they were a good idea. In the process he actually used his twitter to occasionally trashtalk the players who complained about his ideas and balance changes. Older Karma mains also have it out for him because he is essentially the reason why Karma is as bland and uninteractive as today. I’ve done a lot of digging but it appears that Riot and he have done a lot of work to clear up much of what he said and did. You can still find a lot of complaints about his work in history but it’s really hard to find out the exact things he said that lead up to his being fired. Essentially he insulted a ton of players and then pointed fingers at both Riot and the players for being a patriarchy yada yada yada. Basically self destructed. Edit: there’s a decent chance this post might be deleted because it just airs some of Riot’s dirty laundry. Hope you see it before it is!
Personally I hated rickless changes, but your post is completely wrong. He didn’t rework anything major except for the Akali mini rework and Viktor’s E delay. He was the one who gutted LB’s W to deal 30 base damage and 20% AP after her rework, that’s why he was so hated in the LBMains community at that time. Also, as far as I know, he was not fired, he just left Riot.
Comentários de Rioters
: We need tenacity to counter glacial
No, we need Tenacity to counter Shojin Pyke.
Comentários de Rioters
RallerenP (EUW)
: The summoners code isn't a rulebook. It's a guide on how to be a friendly player, but it is not an enforcable set of rules. Otherwise people would be obligated to build friendships with other summoners, or be obligated to help players get better at the game. Neither of these things are enforced rules, but is a social codes. Ways to enhance the experience for you and others around you. Which is why it's called the summoners code and not the summoners rules. --- I agree that Nubrac deserves a punishment, but you can't make breaking the summoners code the reason for it.
Well, technically it isn’t a rule book, but it has been used like one for a very long time, to then point that a ban/chat restriction message openly tells you that you broke the Summoner’s code and that your punishment comes from that.
Spekkıo (NA)
: I don't see how people can justify Nubrac being banned. Everything I see about hating on Nubrac is literally just people asserting things like "He only does it to streamers to amp up his viewership." Alright, show me some evidence to support this. Stop throwing out claims that you can't back up because you 'feel' like it's true because someone said it was or because you're bias towards one side of the equation. Nubrac played something off-meta. It doesn't matter if you agree with it or not. What is important here is intent. Did he play the game? Did he try to win? Did he try to contribute? Etc... It's not "Did he play well? Did he win? Did he do better than if he had played the meta? Did he mute chat cause he knows he's trolling or because he doesn't want to hear everyone flaming him for trying something new?" etc... If he played the game and if he tried to win and if he did try to contribute, then he shouldn't be banned. It's not your place to determine otherwise. It's not your place to slander him because you don't like him or you think he looks ugly or because he's fat, etc... You're supposed to get at the meat of the situation and be objective. Nightblue flamed him on stream, Nightblue talked shit in chat, Nightblue AFK'd in the game. Did Nubrac flame him back? Did Nubrac talk shit in chat? Did Nubrac AFK? No. NB3 deserved to be banned. Nubrac does not. I wouldn't even want Nightblue playing the game after seeing how much of a virtue-signalling piece of shit he is. Do you honestly think Nightblue brings anything to your game, Riot? Think about that for two seconds. Think about what his playerbase is comprised of.... Mainly people who already play League. He's benefiting off your game, not the other way around. If Nightblue disappeared off Twitch/Youtube/etc... tomorrow, he'd be filled by someone else that the community chooses to step into those shoes. It's not like those people are going to quit playing League because some asshole got what he deserved. I'm not advocating for his removal just explaining that you shouldn't be actively defending him when he's in the wrong. Oh and no, people are not OBLIGATED to tell someone they're doing something off-meta. That's a courtesy, it's not mandatory. You might not like someone trying something new and weird but that doesn't mean they should be punished for NOT breaking any rules just because you personally feel annoyed by it. That's not how it works nor should it.
> [{quoted}](name=Spekkıo,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=WuJEL0RA,comment-id=0008,timestamp=2019-06-15T19:58:56.321+0000) > > I don't see how people can justify Nubrac being banned. > > Everything I see about hating on Nubrac is literally just people asserting things like "He only does it to streamers to amp up his viewership." > > Alright, show me some evidence to support this. > > Stop throwing out claims that you can't back up because you 'feel' like it's true because someone said it was or because you're bias towards one side of the equation. > > Nubrac played something off-meta. > > It doesn't matter if you agree with it or not. What is important here is intent. > > Did he play the game? Did he try to win? Did he try to contribute? Etc... > > It's not "Did he play well? Did he win? Did he do better than if he had played the meta? Did he mute chat cause he knows he's trolling or because he doesn't want to hear everyone flaming him for trying something new?" etc... > > If he played the game and if he tried to win and if he did try to contribute, then he shouldn't be banned. It's not your place to determine otherwise. It's not your place to slander him because you don't like him or you think he looks ugly or because he's fat, etc... > > You're supposed to get at the meat of the situation and be objective. > > Nightblue flamed him on stream, Nightblue talked shit in chat, Nightblue AFK'd in the game. > > Did Nubrac flame him back? Did Nubrac talk shit in chat? Did Nubrac AFK? No. > > NB3 deserved to be banned. > Nubrac does not. > > I wouldn't even want Nightblue playing the game after seeing how much of a virtue-signalling piece of shit he is. Do you honestly think Nightblue brings anything to your game, Riot? > > Think about that for two seconds. Think about what his playerbase is comprised of.... Mainly people who already play League. He's benefiting off your game, not the other way around. > > If Nightblue disappeared off Twitch/Youtube/etc... tomorrow, he'd be filled by someone else that the community chooses to step into those shoes. It's not like those people are going to quit playing League because some asshole got what he deserved. I'm not advocating for his removal just explaining that you shouldn't be actively defending him when he's in the wrong. > > Oh and no, people are not OBLIGATED to tell someone they're doing something off-meta. That's a courtesy, it's not mandatory. You might not like someone trying something new and weird but that doesn't mean they should be punished for NOT breaking any rules just because you personally feel annoyed by it. That's not how it works nor should it. Unfortunately it doesn’t work that way. After the Singed support case Riot explicitly said that you can only play off-meta as long as your team agrees with it. If you get multiple reports every game it means that 4 people on your team aren’t having fun because of your off meta strategy. Rightfully so I must say.
Ahri Baka (EUNE)
: I'm with banning the guy He deserved a ban imo and I won't change that opinion He made his adc lane 1v2 even if it worked , that's not off meta , that's trolling Tho , NB3 should have got banned as well , which is why it isn't fair
> [{quoted}](name=Kitsune Kawaii,realm=EUNE,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=WuJEL0RA,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-06-15T11:13:45.467+0000) > > I'm with banning the guy > He deserved a ban imo and I won't change that opinion > He made his adc lane 1v2 > even if it worked , that's not off meta , that's trolling > > Tho , NB3 should have got banned as well , which is why it isn't fair Honestly, I myself think that Nubrac is at fault because he doesn’t tell anything in pre-game lobby, making his team play in a way they might find unfun. But NB3? He went afk and flamed the guy multiple times. There’s also evidence that he holds pre game lobbies hostage if he doesn’t get jungle. He deserves a ban as well.
Comentários de Rioters
: Nightblue gets a player Falsely banned.
Reddit “mods” took the thread down. You can easily find a video of this bullshit on YouTube though.
: Morde sitting at 70% ban rate, 13% pick rate, and 56% WR even with 0 expereince on him
If he ults a melee 90% of the time that guy isn’t coming back alive. I think he’s fairly strong but not overbearing. I tried him yesterday and ulting a ranged champion mid to lategame was a suicide (if you ever reach them). It’s just that he’s very reliable and Darius-level hard. Not saying he doesn’t need a nerf, but he’s much easier than champions like Zoe at release because she was slightly harder to pull off. Personally I can see them nerfing the ult cooldown. It’s fairly low for what it does imo.
Comentários de Rioters
: Some depressing stats about Malphite
He’s getting some changes on PBE. Although it’s not a rework, it’s definitely something.
: Riot intentionally gives lower gains/higher losses in diamond.
Have you posted it on Reddit? I think it would be cool to have it there and I'm sure that the chances of getting an official reply would be much higher.
YDN Mala (EUW)
: Something is wrong here in D4
It has always been like this. I remember getting to D5 in previous seasons with a positive winrate and gaining 16LP for my first win in Diamond whereas I usually got at least 20 in Plat 1. Low Diamond MMR/LP gains have always been fucked up for some reason. Riot promised to address this 3 years ago but there has yet to be an improvement.
: https://champion.gg/champion/Riven/Top 53%? Would love to know where you are getting your stats. She has a 51.39% win rate, which actually is fairly balanced. Started the last patch with a 0% win rate, and only has a 49% win rate in games which last 20 minutes or less. Keep spreading more false information to justify your cognitive bias thinking. Also, saw someone say that she has a 15% play rate, no she does not. lol what the fuck even. It's pretty obvious why Riot doesn't listen to these boards, you guys are complete idiots.
Here are my serious sources unlike champion.gg: https://www.leagueofgraphs.com/champions/builds/riven/diamond https://www.op.gg/champion/riven/statistics/top But I guess we are the biased people, not the Riven main spreading false information.
: Unpopular opinion: {{champion:92}} is problematic in North American play not because she is as intensely broken as people believe, but because she is extremely good at punishing our continental sins - which often have to do with prioritizing "fun" champion fights over good fundamentals. If you push behind your wave, play patiently, are willing to take force-outs and get a CS advantage and not chase her, she becomes very manageable. If you play League like it's Street Fighter, though, she's going to stomp your face in and become a 1v5 horror. For the record, I'm very much in support of nerfs for her - particularly her low-cooldown, manaless, highly spammable shield. I would say that she needs nerfs both to her shield, and to her HP/level gains or other level-based tankiness, in order to prevent how much of a runaway, unkillable snowball she can be when, say, your jungler decides he's a legend in his own mind and eats it as she survives with 50 HP under her tower, then heads back to get an early {{item:3044}} so she can beat your head in with it. But, still, she's not unbeatable. {{champion:6}} in particular tends to have a very easy time forcing her out and denying her combos, but any ranged toplaner and most toplane juggernauts ought to give her a fair amount of trouble when played properly.
Sorry, but that’s not how it works. Riven has a even higher win rate in [Korea](https://www.op.gg/champion/riven/statistics/top), being the first toplaner win and pick rate wise. So no, the whole “western phenomenon” thing doesn’t add up.
Jamaree (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=Fisher No Chains,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=tPOwEUh0,comment-id=00010000,timestamp=2019-04-23T09:44:36.302+0000) > > Considering her 15% playrate, I doubt she’s even that hard to succeed with right now. Why not play her then and confirm that then, or is this going to be one of those times where there is some excuse on why you won't try her? Or my other favorite excuse "on my diamond smurf, I have a 100% win rate over 100 games with her." times instead. Or is this a "I don't enjoy her playstyle, so I don't want to touch her." excuses instead?
Because I don’t want to first time a champ in ranked for no reason. But if I had time I’d indeed pick her up and spam her to diamond for the freest elo of my life. It’s not an excuse, people with 3 working fingers can spam her after 5 normals and still win because she’s so absurdly OP and forgiving that everybody and their mothers can probably pick her up in no time. I’ll check my alt account to see if I have enough BE to buy her and play her.
: She is picked in pro play.
Not enough to warrant a nerf, according to Riot at least.
wolvius (EUW)
: Don't worry tahm is getting nerfs at 42% winrate support, surely that means vayne and riven are next up right???
Because pro play balance > SoloQ balance. Who cares about the majority of the playerbase when Riven isn’t picked at all in pro play eks de.
Jamaree (NA)
: If everyone spammed Riven, her winrate would plummet, she isn't as easy as people make her out to be. Edit: I want to point out that out of the 8 people who have responded to me, 7 have never played Riven in a ranked setting and the other one doesn’t even have a good kda with them and out of the multiple people who downvoted me, they are probably the same as well. I stick to what I say, I think she needs a tiny nerf yes, but she isn’t as easy as any of you think she is and if you guys actually played her, you would see that, but you know how the forums work, got to circlejerk, it can’t be that you are bad or your champion gets countered by them, nope, self improvement fuck that.
Considering her 15% playrate, I doubt she’s even that hard to succeed with right now.
Comentários de Rioters
Infernape (EUW)
: LeBlanc's passive grew out of control
: Everyone is complaining about the state of the game, why don't we complain about the client instead?
The client is terribly optimized, that’s no news. I mean, the client itself uses more resources than the actual game, and that’s ridiculous for one of the biggest games out there. Low specs mode barely works (actually I don’t see many performance differences between low specs and normal mode) and the client takes forever to load if you check the “close client during the game” option. Fun fact: the open alpha/beta that was available before the official release ran way better than the current version.
Meddler (NA)
: Quick Gameplay Thoughts: March 13
Hey Meddler, any context on the LeBlanc nerf? I, and many others LB players feel like that’s the wrong way to hit LB’s pro play power.
: That was the past, but Morganas playstyle is not healthy for mid lane, since it revolves completely around just perma pushing the wave with W while avoiding any kind of player interaction with Q and E. Which is exactly the opposite of what Riots design philosophy has become over time. They want **more** player interaction, not less. Morgana simply denies every engage on her as long as she isn't sure that she can easily kill you and pushes endlessly, forcing you to play farm simulator under your tower if your wave clear doesn't match hers.
Then turn Anivia and Viktor into supports, all they do is clear waves most of the time anyway. /s
Comentários de Rioters
ZaFishbone (EUNE)
: IMHO they didn't lie. They said that ppl aren't as frustrated with her in the East, because she isn't banned as much, they didn't say she wasn't just as strong there.
The issue with that statement is that Riot has never balanced champions based on how frustrating they are. They can’t say “Riven is strong but not frustrating for eastern players so we won’t nerf her” because it makes 0 sense and goes against their very balance philosophy.
: Maybe in other regions people understand that {{item:3161}} and {{item:3812}} are a little too good on her.
Watch Riot proceed to nerf both those items while leaving Riven the way she is because “it’s conqueror and items!!!”. The Riot special: nerf everything an overpowered champion uses, then nerf the champion eventually, while leaving 10 other champions to be trash tier.
Exibir mais

Fisher No Chains

Nível 166 (EUW)
Total de votos positivos
Criar uma discussão