Time to get another twitch prime trial membership.

Kinda fucked how the one guy that actually describes Jax as he is in current more is downvoted. He's laid back and chill now. Sure being that way and still taking anyone 1v1 is pretty badass but I don't think being badass is a decent personality.

just stay away from him. obviously he isn't just gonna let you do that but it's pretty much the gist of it. there's some who can straight up duel him, but not many. The most important thing is not letting him get ahead, he'll statcheck your team. in low elo teemo should do quite well into garen, though if he buys mr you're useless. Singed can do well into him as he's pretty good at keeping ppl away, but you're gonna int your first games. if you're just looking to go even gnar should get you there and once you learn him he should win the matchup.

> [{quoted}](name=Busty Demoness,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=EmA3GaMV,comment-id=001b0000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-09-03T15:26:04.509+0000) > > "These people are doing something I don't like, I deserve to flame them." they're not just doing something i don't like, they're hindering me. > That's acting like a rabid dog as far as I'm concerned. Besides, you agreed to play the game out to the end. You flaming the "headass duo that didn't surrender" because the surrender failed is very much "flaming out of nowhere" because it's definitely equivalent to the flamer throwing a tantrum over "I didn't get the surrender I wanted!" no they are holding 3 people in a game against their wishes. Last time i checked 3 people is more than 2. > You're missing the point. You can't just use a blanket statement "words can't hurt", but you did anyway. at no point did i make that statement. Obviously there's things that shouldn't go, racial slurs have no place in flame, someone resorting to those is a pathetic person and lacks creativity tbh. But in the context of the usual flaming, noone is getting hurt. > And on that same note, nobody is getting hurt over the lack of surrender. Yet SOMEONE going off because of it has obviously let that hurt them to the point they're going off on allies. Same thing goes for someone playing like shit. Wait, no, still "our flame is fine because those reasons are valid reason to flame others". I genuinly don't feel hurt in that situation. like, it's just annoying. it really isn't deep or anything. If i actually do feel offended i just afk farm. > You're accusing someone of being mentally r%%%%%ed (in hostile words at that) over playing badly while you're their ally. I didn't, i called em braindead. an ally doesn't hinder me. > What makes you think that's going to help someone play better? > What makes you think that's going to encourage them to cooperate? > What makes you think that's not you flaming over nothing because it's one game? I don't, nothing i didn't expect em to in the first place, exactly it's just one game so lemme go to the next one. > You don't get to make blanket statements and then pretend you didn't. You don't get to pretend that your flame is justified when it is equivalent to you throwing a tantrum over not getting your way. Again, "they're not allowed to do what I don't want, so I'm flaming them for that". That is your entire argument and it's the same reasoning an immature brat uses. Later. i don't think i actually did, so i guess i must be pretending real good to even convince myself. You have blown things i've said out of proportion and compared what i said to basically agreeing with false accusations, and yet here you are acting all high and mighty. I dont care about what people do, just don't get in my way. Please stop quiting things i never said. dang you lasted so long without calling me names, really got me good tbh, made me reply. wp.

> [{quoted}](name=Busty Demoness,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=EmA3GaMV,comment-id=001b00000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-09-02T21:42:45.707+0000) > > Jesus you are dense. > > You are still acting like it's on the other person "to protect themselves" even though YOU ARE THE ONE STARTING SHIT. I never flame outta nowhere. When some headass duo is inting and preventing the surrender vote to go through tho... The thing is I ain't blaming em for getting flamed, but for crying when they don't use the solution handed to em. Just admitting you're playing like garbage reduces the amount of flame you get a ton. I genuinely don't understand how some of you ppl seem to believe ppl just go flaming ppl outta nowhere. They're ppl, not rabid dogs. > Meanwhile, plenty of people are getting royally screwed over because of accusations with zero proof. It's been happening quite frequently and there's plenty of precedents in both Europe in the USA. > > So before you say "words can't hurt anyone"; remember that men in Spain are often quick to go to a plea deal simply on being accused of sexual assault with zero evidence, a man killed himself over his life being ruined due to an accusation alone on Twitter, another voice actor had his career ruined over an accusation and falsified evidence, and don't forget how a supreme court nominee had his name slandered by accusations when there was no proof. > > Do NOT sit there and tell me "words can't hurt" when there's plenty of evidence otherwise. Perfectly normal people can be hurt by words due to the rampant insanity of those using them. You are one such individual. If you cannot see how, then you're willingly blinding yourself to FACTS and you have no business replying to me. As you seem to like big words you'll recognize the next one: false equivalence. I'mma fucking say it again, cuz ya know I'm the dense one here, this is just flame over a game. Noone is genuinely getting hurt or their lives ruined. I get that bringing up terrible things that happen in our world where your argument would hold up make you think it holds up in every situation. But there's a damn difference between being called braindead in a videogame and falsely being accused for rape. The shit you're bringing up now is much more than words, they're accusations not just words. Don't just fucking downplay real serious issues that ruin lives by putting em at the level of being called a mean word online. So unless you can think of something better than calling me names and blowing the subject outta proportion, cya.

> [{quoted}](name=Busty Demoness,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=EmA3GaMV,comment-id=001b000000000000,timestamp=2019-09-02T18:31:18.895+0000) > > "I'm punching them for doing something I don't like, so it's their fault I'm throwing punches rather than doing something less violent. I should upgrade to swords because they can buy a shield." bad comparison. this is like me punching someone that has the option to equip full plate armor while i have no other weapons but aight. ain't nobody here a real victim of anything. stop acting like this is assault/rape or something. nobody is actually getting hurt. people are getting flamed, not stabbed ffs.

> Not only is his gameplay weak right now good. > but he has so much potential and I feel like it is wasted. no.

> [{quoted}](name=M Schumacher,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=FbKY00Gs,comment-id=00010000000000010000,timestamp=2019-09-02T09:02:45.122+0000) > > Rengar is actually extremely difficult to play. His jungle pathing is horrible and the stealth changes mean you are only going to snowball against braindead opponents. hahahahahahaha.

> I don't want to hear that I should kill myself. I don't want to hear that I'm trash. I don't want people to flame my boyfriend. then don't do shit that would instigate ppl saying it? And if they still do just mute em if it bothers you that much. > What if a person has a really bad day, is really sad and just want to play a game, and is later told to kill himself because he died twice? What fucking good would a mute do by then? they won't hear it again? like idk wtf you expect to happen here? ain't nobody gonna kill themselves over a bad day. > Stop talking like toxicity isn't a problem, because it is. a problem for which you've gotten a solution ingame. a problem that's not exclusive to league at all. a problem that's not gonna affect the game as much as someone runnin it down but is much easier to detect. If you genuinly still want an answer as to why there might be an increase: Most ppl simply don't care about toxicity, they do care about some headass runnin it down. It's there, most of the time it ain't their problem, and when it is they have ways to deal with it. and the real extreme toxicity cases aren't as common as some ppl claim em to be. honestly i wish ppl just learned to flame well, it's always the same old boring crap.

they should really just hand out laptops to homeless ppl but in the end they're just a small indie company so we can't expect them to do all the work.

boards would lose their shit. any subreddit dedicated to something less popular would lose their shit. Cinematics themselves take alot of time and are quite expensive to make. All in all it would make more sense for riot to create cinematics to promote new releases/skinlines. Lore cinematics are very rare and will probably stay that way for a while sadly. The only one's we've gotten are ryze's, jinx' music video and i think the amumu one is lore based. That said they could pick up the whole "rough animation" thing they tried again like with darius and mf. No character in this game would function better to explore runeterra than runeterra's prodigal explorer obviously.

> ah yes the cocky bastard named ezreal has a more interesting lore than someone like the voli comics or silence for the damned story i think it was called but lemme just stop hating on ezreal for now yeah who woulda thought riot's version of the well loved "adventuring archeologist" archetype would be more interesting than "i'm an angery demigod polarbear". the second part's probably true tho. boards would lose their shit.

if she's this tall and she's about as tall as robin. how tall does that make ike?

i'd rather not be stuck with an inting bot tbh. literally all they have to do is allow for surrender vote on afk or just let ppl leave is someone goes afk.

i see i've made the right decision in not watching this anime.

at this point idk if these are serious or not anymore.

> [{quoted}](name=cherrypopper1998,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=H5AVYKTE,comment-id=0007000000000000,timestamp=2019-09-01T14:52:03.222+0000) > > Oh I know XD its my fault I should have specified more I never meant an mmo ...although that would be cool, too but i'm thinking more of a Elder Scrolls type map but with a Runterra theme if they made an elderscrolls type of game in runeterra i'll probably lose another 3 years of my life. it's honestly the way i'd love to see them make a game around the lore. and if it had the same mod potential that would be like a dream.

> [{quoted}](name=CLG ear,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=FVqeaHq1,comment-id=0000000000020000,timestamp=2019-09-01T13:35:25.619+0000) > > people like songs that are objectively bad so there's nothing I can do about that. Objectively the song is bad, but people like it. that's not how music works.

> [{quoted}](name=cherrypopper1998,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=H5AVYKTE,comment-id=00070000,timestamp=2019-09-01T14:18:30.630+0000) > > That's what I said {{sticker:slayer-jinx-catface}} my comment was mainly aimed at the comment section. they instantly hopped on that dumbass mmo train again.

before i get in range to kill secure you mean, right?

maybe i should start playing jungle again.

i better keep my mouth shut here before ulanopo bans my ass again.

open world rpg aren't the same thing as MMOs. if y'all wanna beg for an mmo feel free but atleast make that clear. some of us would actually much rather have a true open world rpg.

that's in no way better than the chroma idea. This worked for leona because she empowers herself during her ult, thematically she channels the sun/moon in those skins. There's no point in xayah suddenly becoming pure, and honestly i'd expect rakan to preserve his light for xayah considering the lore.

> [{quoted}](name=A Latte Trouble,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=e0fQb1pu,comment-id=0004000000000001000000000000,timestamp=2019-08-29T22:40:11.640+0000) > > I completely agree that it's overused. In this particular context I believe it's used because OP lacks confidence in his own masculinity to the point where he has to reiterate it, lest it be challenged by his casual discussion of personal hygiene. It's not really toxic to anyone as long as he's not projecting that onto other guys, it's just odd. they weren't talking to the op so that has nothing to do with any of this.

jinx and leo exist so this is just wrong.

just thought i'd let you know you forgot ezreal.

> [{quoted}](name=A Latte Trouble,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=e0fQb1pu,comment-id=00040000000000010000,timestamp=2019-08-29T19:13:21.418+0000) > > I know that this isn't the point of your reply, but you have a fundamental misunderstanding of what toxic masculinity means. > > Masculinity is an incredible and powerful thing. Toxic masculinity is a widely misunderstood phrase for referring to the type of masculinity that keeps men from doing anything that may be considered weak, else they are shamed and their masculinity be called into question. Crying, showing emotion, caring about appearance, personal hygiene, etc. Hell, even appreciating art and beauty calls masculinity into question for some reason? > It's about men being pushed into a very small box, which is toxic. > > Just to be clear, there's absolutely nothing wrong with showing little emotion, not giving a shit about art, not caring much about your appearance, etc., however it becomes an issue when everyone is forced into that box or ridiculed for stepping outside of it. > > Again, I know this isn't the point of your post, but I used to be in the same boat as you, and finding out what toxic masculinity actually meant made me a lot less annoyed when people used the term. then there was absolutely no reason to use the term here, which is why i find this hard to believe. The term wouldn't have such bad rep if it wasn't overused like it is. I'd be fine with being told these definitions if they actually held up. all they did was point out the general on things.

as far as gods go there are none in game rn. We know the bearded lady/ Nagakabourous is worship by illaoi, that doesn't mean they're an actual god though. Kindred is a story, a legend, like the grim reaper is in ours afaik. Death has so many variables in the lore it seems, i think the safest bet is to say kindred is like janna. they're an existance born from the believe in them. and thus she manifests in those areas. A sol is just a big lizard tbh. There are Demi gods in the freljord tho we have very little detail as to why they are demi gods especially considering asol could probably destroy em. If anyone knows about a god it's most likely bard i guess. but we also don't know what seperates bard from spirits like janna.

> Mobile games are shit that's just simply not true. Games aren't bad because they're mobile, they're bad cuz they're bad. If league gets a mobile release it'll still be league, same game. OSRS has a mobile client and it does fine, it's the same game that exists on pc. honestly i'd love to play certain older games on mobile, the isometric fallout games for example would be more enjoyable to me to play on the go. Nintendo and even Sony have proven that there is a want for gaming on the go, so why would you not bring that to phones?

> [{quoted}](name=Arcade Lulu,realm=EUNE,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=e0fQb1pu,comment-id=000400000000,timestamp=2019-08-28T19:42:42.686+0000) > > But talking about shampoos and conditioners doesn't make you gay. That's just stereotyping and idiotic. And "all "feminine" men are gays" is also a bs stereotype, because those 2 have NOTHING to do with each other > Personality and personal style have nothing to do with your sexual orientation > Talking about shampoo/conditioner just shows that you care about your personal hygiene > Is caring about personal hygiene gay?? :O > Men engaging in feminine behavior doesn't make them feminine, or gay > Nearly not all gays are feminine, there are some really beefy and masculine dudes most of the stereotypes coming in to play here are just generalizations. Stereotype sounds worse tho so gj. you can do better than just going "personal hygiene gay??:o" there's a difference between caring and actually keeping it in order. plenty ppl don't give a shit, grab the shampoo that's there and shower. None of these things actually make you gay nor does the reverse apply to making a girl gay. but these are still generalisations that most people's basic views conform to. > And it honestly seems like that you think being feminine and/or being gay is somehow bad where does it seem like that? i'd like you to point out exactly where. all they did was point out why somebody might think those things are gay/make you gay. > Your whole being just screams toxic and fragile masculinity. Sorrynotsorry you were genuinly just looking for an excuse to say this shit right? This notion that femininity is somehow great but masculinity is bad is garbage.

i got a 2 week ban for calling reddit mods neckbeards once, apparently that's offensive towards boards mods.

> You still don't get it, I don't know how much simpler I could make the comparison. You couldn't, because your comparison is flawed and you have no more arguments. so instead you start questioning my capabilities of understanding you. There's clearly no argument being made other than "just accept i'm right" so i'mma leave it at this cya.

> No, you obviously play with one ball or it isn't roulette. I get this might be hard for you to understand, but even with less than HALF the numbers in roulette as their are champs in league, you VERY RARELY hit the same number twice. yes i'm gonna be honest here, i do find it difficult to understand how this comparison still holds up then. If you want a champ to never be on your team back to back, you're playing roulette with 5-15 balls, if you don't want em in your game 10-30. now even in a situation where you do play roulette by aram's rules, roulette will have a better "rate of randomness" simply because a computer can't do true random. > (I roll Nunu and reroll, next champ select someone else rolls Nunu) ... do you genuinly expect the random system to take everybodies previous game into account to make sure the same champ isn't on someone's team that had em on their team the match before? cuz i'm pretty sure that would have a bad effect on matchmaking.

> And I liked the idea that Nautilus is some ancient titan enforcing the will of the bearded lady. this is honestly my only issue with this whole thing. Nautilus, the man, completely dissapeared and with it his somberness did too. He's just a mindless slave now.

> [{quoted}](name=deep space waifu,realm=EUNE,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=ZP837yhj,comment-id=000400000000,timestamp=2019-08-27T19:39:38.619+0000) > > If you honestly think jinx fits the star guardian theme https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DxeDmwYU8AAXtsK.jpg

She's corrupted afaik, that's not exactly evil. If her only goal really is having sisters or some shit, then honestly it fits. Zoe in lore is just a reckless child with too much power, her previous incarnation was a bitch. that said. How does zoe not fit? she uses magic, she's a girl and ffs her character is basically a big ass anime trope. Where the hell was this backlash when they made jinx into a SG and went against her own character completely in the star guardian lore.

"never forget: the things i liked weren't the most popular"

ezreal said no.

> Tft rank should be shown separately or even better move the whole game to another client because tft is not a mode for league it's a completely different game. While i absolutely agree with the second part here, I expect this client to not just be a league client quite soon. With the upcoming fighting game and all.

> {{champion:516}} Hasn't had a skin since his release on 22nd of August, 2017 that ain't even close to 1000 why would he deserve an honourable mention?

he's basically in a kayn situation but with 2 dudes. there's no point in changing his model if you're gonna change his lore and vice versa. he'll most likely get a VO update at some point and maybe some slight model changes. Darkin can reshape flesh, so this might just have been close to how varus looked pre sealing. Visually he's fine for his current lore as trash as it is. he coulda been some guy that overcame the darkin in the bow, but instead we got "kayn but it's 2 gay dudes".

we'd actually need shen to be in the game for that first, so how about we just bring shen back?

you get a shit ton of stuff if you just don't mindlessly disenchant. reroll low price skins.

and then he ruins your game like they ruined this anime.

in roulette you don't play with 10 balls do you? nevermind potentially 30. and like you said not everyone has every champ unlocked, i realise this seems to be a strange concept on these boards but not everyone who doesn't unlock all champs is an aram account.

3.9% banrate.

SG jinx is inferior to classic and slayer in every way the ppl in that thread high as shit.

hasn't she always been a snowball champion?