: New champion revealed - Aphelios, the Weapon of the Faithful
I like it. Looks like someone who will have to learn some harsh lessons about faith.
Ulanopo (NA)
: I've edited your post to remove the inappropriate image. We do not permit the posting of religious icons under the "inapproriate Discussion Topics" portion of the [Universal Boards Rules](https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/community-moderation/ITFIpNUE). This is especially true when the icon has been modified in a way that could be seen as disrespectful. If you have any questions about this moderation action, don't hesitate to reach out to the Boards Moderation Team via: * The [**NA Boards Discord**](https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/community-moderation/7rtKBZLi-boards-moderation-discord-verification) * The [**Discuss the Boards**](https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/community-moderation) sub-board ~ Ulanopo
> [{quoted}](name=Ulanopo,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=tIOGJNwb,comment-id=0011,timestamp=2019-11-19T00:02:29.681+0000) > > I've edited your post to remove the inappropriate image. > > We do not permit the posting of religious icons under the "inapproriate Discussion Topics" portion of the [Universal Boards Rules](https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/community-moderation/ITFIpNUE). This is especially true when the icon has been modified in a way that could be seen as disrespectful. > > If you have any questions about this moderation action, don't hesitate to reach out to the Boards Moderation Team via: > > * The [**NA Boards Discord**](https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/community-moderation/7rtKBZLi-boards-moderation-discord-verification) > * The [**Discuss the Boards**](https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/community-moderation) sub-board > > ~ Ulanopo Out of curiosity, do you know how many people reported that thread and can you share that information?
: > [{quoted}](name=PzyXo,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=tIOGJNwb,comment-id=00000003,timestamp=2019-11-18T11:27:52.193+0000) > > Ahhh, edited the statue of Jesus. I remember a dude making fun of Islam as a meme, people complained and no mod deleted it. > [{quoted}](name=PzyXo,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=tIOGJNwb,comment-id=00000003,timestamp=2019-11-18T11:27:52.193+0000) > > Ahhh, edited the statue of Jesus. I remember a dude making fun of Islam as a meme, people complained and no mod deleted it. Well, that'd be unfortunate to have missed removing that Islam meme. Personally, I didn't recognize the Jesus statue, but I would have similarly removed it (if someone were to point out the statue). People have varying opinions of religion, and memeing one opens the door to memeing others, which I don't think everyone in the community would be ok with.
> [{quoted}](name=Periscope,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=tIOGJNwb,comment-id=000000030000,timestamp=2019-11-18T12:56:16.289+0000) > > Well, that'd be unfortunate to have missed removing that Islam meme. > > Personally, I didn't recognize the Jesus statue, but I would have similarly removed it (if someone were to point out the statue). People have varying opinions of religion, and memeing one opens the door to memeing others, which I don't think everyone in the community would be ok with. Which is incredibly sad because the meme OP used wasn't used in a way to antagonize a religion (or its followers), but to make fun of TD Yasuo by elevating him to something holy. You worry about not everyone being fine with that, but ironically not everyone is fine with those people being protected in that way. To be frank, this removal feels like a failed attempt at being inclusive with opposite effects as a result.
: > [{quoted}](name=Madjack01,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=EhaGzIaW,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2019-11-17T22:51:59.882+0000) > > So Akali used to have free healing in her kit? Yes she did upon first being reworked if you used her q while at max energy you got health back. Just one of those unneeded things they add to a new rework to assure they are played.
> [{quoted}](name=LightswornLance,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=EhaGzIaW,comment-id=00020000,timestamp=2019-11-18T00:10:20.685+0000) > > Yes she did upon first being reworked if you used her q while at max energy you got health back. Just one of those unneeded things they add to a new rework to assure they are played. I'm well aware of that. I mentioned it as sort of a wink towards how op undermined his own point.
: Gratz to League/Riot: Winner of Esport Game of the Year and Esport Publisher of the Year.
I'm conflicted whether or not that's a good thing for the gamers among us not caring about esports but I'll grant Riot the win.
: Please stop using the word "free" when talking about what champions have.
Comentários de Rioters
: And If you type into search bar cancer...
> [{quoted}](name=Velzard of Koz,realm=EUNE,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=E6l8OG4A,comment-id=00020000,timestamp=2019-11-16T13:38:04.261+0000) > > And If you type into search bar cancer... the "you have been banned" message pops up.
Jikker (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=DalekZec,realm=EUNE,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=51pp3Izf,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2019-11-15T17:44:21.407+0000) > > At least you still had 2 days of weekends...they just happen to be tuesday and sunday or wednesday and sunday. Yeah, it's great fun when you don't get the days off with your friends so while they are out doing stuff on Friday night or on Saturday, you're working late or getting a good night sleep cause up at 5:00 am the next morning. Also awesome when your days off don't let you see your significant other except briefly in the evenings/mornings because of days/hours worked. One of my coworkers got no days off at all. He had to work two jobs and the days off overlapped so no days off. Another friend only got 1 day off cause of the way her jobs lined up. She worked that way for over 2 years. Long story short, quit complaining; 4 weeks of no Saturdays is not that bad, especially just for classes.
> [{quoted}](name=Jikker,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=51pp3Izf,comment-id=000000000000,timestamp=2019-11-15T19:21:08.835+0000) > > Long story short, quit complaining; 4 weeks of no Saturdays is not that bad, especially just for classes. Indeed. I mean, that's a problem I would like to have if it meant going to uni again.
: Age of Empires 4 news tomorrow.
Was it age of empires where you could cheat an op sports car (or something like that) to obliterate your foes who fought with swords and boys? Edit: I meant bows...
: Did anyone else get some kind of email to update to a riot account?
Ooh, did it come from some totally authentic Ri0t email account with hyperlinks that, if you hover over them, say "//http click#on/me#to//sell€your!soul$$and##children//also#don't#mind@@the#huge@data!!flow/coming@from**your&pc##trust/us.comz"?
Riot Pls (NA)
: Future Stories
How about something about the daily life of the common people (doesn't matter what region) and how they get to be a part of all the awesome things around them. You could tie in how they hear about and see the legendary heroes/villains, how they witness terrors like the void and the struggle of the legends against those terrors and so on. I think this would be nicely suited for a collection of very short stories instead of one short-ish story. Like a mini story about someone enjoying food at a snack stall while Jinx blows up stuff in the back ground, chased by Vi punching walls. Followed by a mini story about a soldier that has the bad luck of meeting one of the legends in battle. Followed by a mini story about a demacian farmer witnessing the struggle between mages and the government, who then tells his mates what he saw over a beer etc. You get the idea. It's all about perspective.
: what if I'm a one trick... in all roles ? {{champion:432}}
> [{quoted}](name=Worst Brad Japan,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=NVVZvh7H,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-11-05T16:16:56.319+0000) > > what if I'm a one trick... in all roles ? > > {{champion:432}} ...then you are probably unable to answer my question.
Comentários de Rioters
: What is your Favorite Snack to munch on while Playing League.
I feast on the salt shed by the community. Also asian rice snacks because those are awesome.
: So this happened
The most amazing part were the people looking to be impaled by Nida spears.
ru5m1r3 (EUW)
: Your login credentials don't match an account in your system
Ulanopo (NA)
: Proposed Rules Update to Gameplay Sub-Board (Feedback Wanted)
> [{quoted}](name=Ulanopo,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=XPgk5MhA,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-11-02T13:31:33.876+0000) > “I feel Yasuo has too many tools and is generally too safe once you’ve mastered him, with Windwall being an excellent example of this”. > This is a very powerful sentence in combination with the following statement that deserves to be extra highlighted. > > DO LEAVE ROOM FOR DISAGREEMENT > The Boards are for sharing ideas and discussion. Dealing in absolutes prevents those things. Calling for a champion to be gutted generally ends all conversation. Likewise, refusing to see how someone else could have a different - even contradictory - opinion or perspective closes off possibilities. The reason I think it deserves to be extra highlighted is because it is easier to have a constructive discussion when you present your ideas from a clear personal point of view. It's when people express their opinions as general truths (even if it's unintentional) that people become defensive and sarcastic. When you discuss something, by the very definition of it, you leave yourself vulnerable to critique. And that's how it should be, I think. Accepting that goes a long way.
: Hasnt midlane had everything already? Toplane too?
> [{quoted}](name=Thefrostyviking,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=4BI1A7yK,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2019-11-02T10:59:09.410+0000) > > Hasnt midlane had everything already? Toplane too? That could be. The major difference here would be that the support role is more forgiving when learning a different play style than it is with the solo lanes. Your mistakes don't stand out as much.
: Support Solo Carry Just banish your adc to another lane.
> [{quoted}](name=DerMangoJoghurt,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=4BI1A7yK,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-11-02T10:13:28.508+0000) > > Support Solo Carry > > Just banish your adc to another lane. {{champion:63}}{{champion:99}} 'I locked in support, I thought it meant that others would have to support me.' Tbh it would be derpy as hell if a support had an automatic Poppy ult as passive that shoots the allied adc out of lane every time he comes near.
Comentários de Rioters
: So why don't we get to randomize our skins >:(
They thought of this as well. It's on their backlog-basement along with Udyr's hopes and dreams, the skin ideas for unpopular champs and the step moms of Riot employees.
Comentários de Rioters
: Worldbuilding - Your Turn! Part III
In my head void monsters can appear out of nowhere, mostly at densely populated areas, roaming the night and knocking on the doors of fearful citizens. Humming, whispers and bone scraping on stone can be heard resonating with the misty night's air. The creatures disappear into nothingness just like they appeared... unless some reckless citizen dared to catch a glimpse, seduced by curiosity and imagination. The monsters of the void know they were watched, feeling the gaze still burning on their shells. The reckless citizen, in the warmth of home, opens his curtains for one last quick look, but the void in all it's vileness stares back with brilliant pearly eyes, just a breath's distance from the window. The screams would echo through the darkness, as a lesson for all nosy neighbors that curiosity...begets death. I have no idea about actual void lore so I have no idea if my head canon could fit.
Ehhhh (EUW)
: My friend got Teemo but someone dodged. after we accepted, he got Teemo again, but once again someone dodged. We accepted a third time, and we was both surprised to see that he didn't get Teemo... And then he rerolled... 3 Teemos in a row dosnt seem very random to me{{sticker:zombie-brand-mindblown}}
> [{quoted}](name=Ehhhh,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=q8Gk0KUN,comment-id=0005,timestamp=2019-10-21T11:00:41.081+0000) > > My friend got Teemo but someone dodged. after we accepted, he got Teemo again, but once again someone dodged. We accepted a third time, and we was both surprised to see that he didn't get Teemo... And then he rerolled... 3 Teemos in a row dosnt seem very random to me{{sticker:zombie-brand-mindblown}} To be fair true randomness is not really possible for a system to simulate. There will always be some values which form the basis of some calculation that leads to a predetermined outcome. I'm not knowledgeable in IT but that's how it was explained to me. Depending on how a system tries to achieve randomness, it is possible that the calculation is veeeery slightly skewered towards getting a similar value like the starting one. There is also confirmation biases.
cQaAlma (NA)
: ARAM is really SCEG: Same Champions Every Game thanks to ARAM accounts
I don't have an Aram account but I would stop playing aram if they'd unlock all champs. Firstly because the problem isn't nearly as significant as the circle jerk in this thread implies. Secondly because I have no interest in playing 3/4th of the roster, especially the ones I avoided buying.
  Comentários de Rioters
: LoR Lux... doesn't quite look right.
Ye, they broke her boob plate
: I watched C9 vs Hong Kong Attitude today
I'm down with anything that breaks the mold of how lanes should look like. Imo the consensus about the composition of the lanes holds the game back more than it does good. Not that I think that some structure and recurrence isn't good, I just like to see the stone tablet crumble a bit. Question is though how relevant is what the pros do for us mortals. As far as I know not even half of it trickles down in a meaningful way.
Rαy (EUW)
: Background is cool, face looks kinda weird IMO.
> [{quoted}](name=Rαy,realm=EUW,application-id=6kFXY1kR,discussion-id=TE1RjzjG,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2019-10-13T16:45:51.166+0000) > > Background is cool, face looks kinda weird IMO. With that stupid grin the dude looks like he smoked too much weed.
Cloud273 (NA)
: Video games cost less than movies to make, but they cost more...
Did you look up how much profit movies make compared to games?
BotJambal (EUNE)
: Why do I keep playing League
I'm an olderish gamer and too lazy/unwilling to learn the complexities of another game that technically provides an endless stream of gameplay. Also LoL still feels well polished to me compared to other games. I tried OW, but that game could turn my blood to fiery lava and my keyboard has never been the same. Not to forget that Blizz has ruined their franchises for me when they went the disney route. I tried mmo's but due to that I found out that Einstein was wrong. The true definition of madness is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting to get the same fucking result every time. I tried Dota but see the very first sentence of this comment. LoL just still feels good after years of playing. Maybe switching to semi-multiplayer games might be easier for you. I'm having a blast with the souls borne series and currently get carried by my mates in endless space 2.
: > [{quoted}](name=Rockman,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=Ec4ZIMqF,comment-id=0007,timestamp=2019-10-05T16:41:48.441+0000) > > If it's my birthday do I get a Get Out of Jail Free card? No, because I keep getting downvoted.
> [{quoted}](name=ChickenWrap,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=Ec4ZIMqF,comment-id=00070000,timestamp=2019-10-05T17:02:58.093+0000) > > No, because I keep getting downvoted. Maybe try telling people next year to _not_ behave because it's your bday. See i f that works better.
Comentários de Rioters
: What skin lines would fit your main amazingly that you know Riot won't do?
I want to see a psychopath/murderer/villain version ( a mature and dark one, not the Disney kind) of all the champs that are too cute/good. I always symphatise more with the bad guys :(
GGEazzy (EUW)
: Why am I being matched with a feeder troll I just reported moments ago?
Reporting someone will not protect you from playing with that player again. As far as I know it never has and never should because people would just abuse it. It might be a good middle solution to create temporary protection for maybe an hour or two where you accept the longer queue time (if applicable).
SEKAI (OCE)
: > [{quoted}](name=Madjack01,realm=EUW,application-id=6kFXY1kR,discussion-id=NeYQhZiJ,comment-id=0006,timestamp=2019-09-21T07:25:21.167+0000) > > Seems to me that the topic about sexuality transcended beyond mere attraction and has intensively become socio-political. > > Hence why there is so much hate, other than that of ignorant people who plagued the discussion with their stupidity since forever. You are delivering a political message whenever you're trying to address, discuss, mention, refer or allude to anything that remotely is about or often simply relates to the real world. The instant you're trying to make a point that has tangible meaning in the real world, if it's not an entirely moral declaration, then you ARE making a political statement. What's more, there is usually little difference between moral and politics too, the sole difference is that you can say politics is the more developed version of moral since it contains both the rhetorics and at least some kind of substantiation, whereas moral usually end at the former. **And yes, by political messages, it includes both promotion of different sexuality in our otherwise sexually repressed history (the more recent history that is) as well as the dime a dozen themes like "big corporation bad".** Even if you don't intend explicit political messages into your creation, you are still a collection of your experiences and beliefs, and they will still subconsciously permeate into work and reside within it as subtexts. Thus this "I don't want politics" is outright absurd. Because it's equivalent to asking for media to have quite literally no nuance. Any work of creation that has nuance when us in the real world can look at it, see it's relevant, and take something away from it, means it's political. Unless you're content with reading fairytales for the rest of eternity otherwise the notion of taking issues simply because there's politics in a fictional work of art, is absolutely absurd; and even then a great deal of fairytales were also political themselves, because surprise, Red Riding Hood was a lot more than just a story about a little girl, her grandma, the wolf, and the hunter. Not to mention, people don't actually jump up and down simply because it is political, do they? Because if that were the case, let's just say most players don't like politics 1 bit and content to stay on moralistic fairytales being the deepest philosophical challenge they'd ever face in video games for the rest of their life, how do we explain games like Bioshock (blatant criticism of capitalism and libertarianism), Mass Effect (promotion of multiculturalism), Witcher (criticism of discrimination in general; you even play as a minority who almost everyone bm's you too), Dark Souls (explicit rejection of aristocrats and capitalist elites and promoting acceptance towards societal change), CoD (flip-flopping between anti-war and glorifying war, after all US military complex literally fund this game franchise for recruitment propaganda), which all have VERY explicit political messages, are in fact also mainstream and highly popular and critically acclaimed? And we aren't even touching the tip of the iceburg, more so when we also consider the fact we are also ignoring games with implicit and/or unintended political messages that still nonetheless come across due to the subconscious permeation I'd mentioned earlier. To pick an example that's easy to talk about there's Escape From Tarkov, which is a game where everyone plays an ex-soldier if I recall correctly, and get this: There's only men in the game, either the player or the NPCs; there's not a single women in the entire game because there is simply no female model. There's no explicit message being given since it's a factor that's never brought up in the actual game, but you can all see the implicit messages of this, that either they don't really give a shit about female player models so they just put them on the backburners or may even be hostile towards the idea. Point is, there are a LOT of politics in media, including video games. Because politics is in fact, a part of the nuance itself, particularly the thematic and the narrative. **You can't get serious, even half-serious, without getting political.** There are ultimately, 2 kinds of players that moan "muh politics": 1. The first kind of players players don't actually hate nuance or politics, but instead they hate few specific sectors of politics that they've already slashed with a red cross before they even begin talking simply because they haven't been confronted by that before and thus their first reaction is to simply shut it out. Also known as being a "reactionary". 2. The second kind is much worse, they are the ones that choose out of their own will to subscribe to an unthinking and reductionist worldview, and expect the media they consume to be just as hollow as their beliefs or lack thereof. These are the ones that typically are so politically uneducated, they actually don't recognise ANY political messages in any games at all even when they're literally hanging on the ceiling waiting to be seen. These players are the type of people who bitch specifically on the VERY 'in-your-face' political messages (and if it's meant to be satire, you bet these goons would take it seriously and get mad about it) because those are the only ones they can actually see, and they just hate it because they want nothing to do with actually using their braincells apart from getting their next kill streak or something. In the end of the day, there is nothing wrong with politics, because that is how **ANY MEDIA GROUNDS ITSELF IN REALITY AND SPEAKS TO THE AUDIENCE**. It is also what pushes genres forward as times change and what creates new genres. Harping on politics being in games is an utterly unproductive and silly endeavour that does nothing but dooming the media into a slow death of having tangible substance slowly drained or worse, denied out of it. ...... ...... ...... TLDR: When people complaining about "too much politics" in games, this is usually the actual situation. https://i.redd.it/cxf1yfikrvw21.png Most people complaining about "politics" are mostly either just reactionaries overreacting on things they aren't familiar with, or they're some hooligan who has no idea and merely complains because it asks them to think about something irl relevant (and they pick their bones the most on the ones having to do with sexuality, gender, and ethnicity; and not even all of them, just the lowest hanging of them. Because they're all so uneducated they can't see topics regarding any other political matters regardless of how low they hanged, and so those 3 that they actually have the ability to catch glimpses of due to their inherent qualities become their primary crying point).
> [{quoted}](name=SEKAI,realm=OCE,application-id=6kFXY1kR,discussion-id=NeYQhZiJ,comment-id=00060000,timestamp=2019-09-21T09:51:44.305+0000) > > You are delivering a political message whenever you're trying to address, discuss, mention, refer or allude to anything that remotely is about or often simply relates to the real world. The instant you're trying to make a point that has tangible meaning in the real world, if it's not an entirely moral declaration, then you ARE making a political statement. What's more, there is usually little difference between moral and politics too, the sole difference is that you can say politics is the more developed version of moral since it contains both the rhetorics and at least some kind of substantiation, whereas moral usually end at the former. > > **And yes, by political messages, it includes both promotion of different sexuality in our otherwise sexually repressed history (the more recent history that is) as well as the dime a dozen themes like "big corporation bad".** > > Even if you don't intend explicit political messages into your creation, you are still a collection of your experiences and beliefs, and they will still subconsciously permeate into work and reside within it as subtexts. > > Thus this "I don't want politics" is outright absurd. Because it's equivalent to asking for media to have quite literally no nuance. Any work of creation that has nuance when us in the real world can look at it, see it's relevant, and take something away from it, means it's political. Unless you're content with reading fairytales for the rest of eternity otherwise the notion of taking issues simply because there's politics in a fictional work of art, is absolutely absurd; and even then a great deal of fairytales were also political themselves, because surprise, Red Riding Hood was a lot more than just a story about a little girl, her grandma, the wolf, and the hunter. > > Not to mention, people don't actually jump up and down simply because it is political, do they? > > Because if that were the case, let's just say most players don't like politics 1 bit and content to stay on moralistic fairytales being the deepest philosophical challenge they'd ever face in video games for the rest of their life, how do we explain games like Bioshock (blatant criticism of capitalism and libertarianism), Mass Effect (promotion of multiculturalism), Witcher (criticism of discrimination in general; you even play as a minority who almost everyone bm's you too), Dark Souls (explicit rejection of aristocrats and capitalist elites and promoting acceptance towards societal change), CoD (flip-flopping between anti-war and glorifying war, after all US military complex literally fund this game franchise for recruitment propaganda), which all have VERY explicit political messages, are in fact also mainstream and highly popular and critically acclaimed? > > And we aren't even touching the tip of the iceburg, more so when we also consider the fact we are also ignoring games with implicit and/or unintended political messages that still nonetheless come across due to the subconscious permeation I'd mentioned earlier. To pick an example that's easy to talk about there's Escape From Tarkov, which is a game where everyone plays an ex-soldier if I recall correctly, and get this: There's only men in the game, either the player or the NPCs; there's not a single women in the entire game because there is simply no female model. There's no explicit message being given since it's a factor that's never brought up in the actual game, but you can all see the implicit messages of this, that either they don't really give a shit about female player models so they just put them on the backburners or may even be hostile towards the idea. > > Point is, there are a LOT of politics in media, including video games. Because politics is in fact, a part of the nuance itself, particularly the thematic and the narrative. **You can't get serious, even half-serious, without getting political.** > > There are ultimately, 2 kinds of players that moan "muh politics": > > 1. The first kind of players players don't actually hate nuance or politics, but instead they hate few specific sectors of politics that they've already slashed with a red cross before they even begin talking simply because they haven't been confronted by that before and thus their first reaction is to simply shut it out. Also known as being a "reactionary". > 2. The second kind is much worse, they are the ones that choose out of their own will to subscribe to an unthinking and reductionist worldview, and expect the media they consume to be just as hollow as their beliefs or lack thereof. These are the ones that typically are so politically uneducated, they actually don't recognise ANY political messages in any games at all even when they're literally hanging on the ceiling waiting to be seen. These players are the type of people who bitch specifically on the VERY 'in-your-face' political messages (and if it's meant to be satire, you bet these goons would take it seriously and get mad about it) because those are the only ones they can actually see, and they just hate it because they want nothing to do with actually using their braincells apart from getting their next kill streak or something. > > In the end of the day, there is nothing wrong with politics, because that is how **ANY MEDIA GROUNDS ITSELF IN REALITY AND SPEAKS TO THE AUDIENCE**. It is also what pushes genres forward as times change and what creates new genres. Harping on politics being in games is an utterly unproductive and silly endeavour that does nothing but dooming the media into a slow death of having tangible substance slowly drained or worse, denied out of it. > > ...... > ...... > ...... > > TLDR: > > When people complaining about "too much politics" in games, this is usually the actual situation. > > https://i.redd.it/cxf1yfikrvw21.png > > Most people complaining about "politics" are mostly either just reactionaries overreacting on things they aren't familiar with, or they're some hooligan who has no idea and merely complains because it asks them to think about something irl relevant (and they pick their bones the most on the ones having to do with sexuality, gender, and ethnicity; and not even all of them, just the lowest hanging of them. Because they're all so uneducated they can't see topics regarding any other political matters regardless of how low they hanged, and so those 3 that they actually have the ability to catch glimpses of due to their inherent qualities become their primary crying point). There is so much generalization in here that my entire desire to discuss has been extinguished. Well played.
Jacksin (OCE)
: Why can't we productively conversate about champion sexuality without there being so much negativity
Seems to me that the topic about sexuality transcended beyond mere attraction and has intensively become socio-political. Hence why there is so much hate, other than that of ignorant people who plagued the discussion with their stupidity since forever.
Jadiac5 (EUW)
: Dear Riot I´d like to talk about Evelyn for a second
This buff seems to me like a pat on the head for low elo players like me while not changing much for the pros. Unlike what you mentioned I rarely get to kill anything with just q and e, hence probably why I'm considered a scrub. So this buff helps me a lot. Maybe that was Riots intention? I don't know.
ADC ok (NA)
: Why is Sylas so buff looking?
It looks good which is all the reason they fucking need. Guess what, every damn thing you see in games and movies (even the supposedly realistic things) get beautified because that's what people like.
SEKAI (OCE)
: Imagine if the meme was "This day makes me wanna launch the 10th Jihad. Allahu Akbar!" People would be jumping up and down. EDIT: Oh look, downvotes. How cute.
> [{quoted}](name=SEKAI,realm=OCE,application-id=Ir7ZrJjF,discussion-id=zAKkZnuY,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2019-09-09T19:57:09.647+0000) > > Imagine if the meme was "This day makes me wanna launch the 10th Jihad. Allahu Akbar!" People would be jumping up and down. > How do you know that?
: > [{quoted}](name=Madjack01,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=RPMdBEsW,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2019-09-09T21:22:57.512+0000) > > The thing is though that not everybody has the time to grind the full 25 tokens that come with an event pass. To those 4 months (and maybe 2 or 3 events?) is not that much. Event passes are one way to get prestige points, yes, but you can also buy them straight up. Regardless, you still have 4 months to spend them, and there could be a Halloween, Christmas, and probably some other Prestige skin smacked in between them to use your tokens on before February 1st. It's a bit early to be warning people about them, when there's so much more of the year and who knows how many more Prestige skins coming out. Furthermore, Riot DID say that the event Prestige skins would be getting moved into the Points shop at some point, so they could plan on that later in the year too.
> [{quoted}](name=Oleandervine,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=RPMdBEsW,comment-id=000000000000,timestamp=2019-09-09T21:27:15.147+0000) > > Event passes are one way to get prestige points, yes, but you can also buy them straight up. Regardless, you still have 4 months to spend them, and there could be a Halloween, Christmas, and probably some other Prestige skin smacked in between them to use your tokens on before February 1st. It's a bit early to be warning people about them, when there's so much more of the year and who knows how many more Prestige skins coming out. Furthermore, Riot DID say that the event Prestige skins would be getting moved into the Points shop at some point, so they could plan on that later in the year too. I sure hope they put something good into the shop so that the effort of grinding the events pays off (where did they say that about the event skins?). Buying tokens directly is not meant for me so I gotta go at it steadily with the passes.
: That's like 4 months away, it's a tad early to be worried about your points expiring, especially with a quarter of the year left for them to release new prestige skins during.
> [{quoted}](name=Oleandervine,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=RPMdBEsW,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-09-09T21:20:24.631+0000) > > That's like 4 months away, it's a tad early to be worried about your points expiring, especially with a quarter of the year left for them to release new prestige skins during. Can't hurt to be aware of this. The thing is though that not everybody has the time to grind the full 25 tokens that come with an event pass. To those 4 months (and maybe 2 or 3 events?) is not that much.
Comentários de Rioters
: > [{quoted}](name=SEKAI,realm=OCE,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=uf3dwxsq,comment-id=00040000,timestamp=2019-09-08T19:48:29.411+0000) > > You're playing a game mode that's all about random shit, or it's meant to be the case. First timing is the least of your worries, it's a part of the experience. > > You don't sit down at a poker table expecting to be dealt the exact hand you want to get. > > After each game you check your teammate and your opponent's match history. If they play almost to entirely exclusively ARAM with a very high champion re-occurrence rate and/or it's just cycling through a small handful of re-occurring poke-intensive champs, then you're looking at an ARAM only account. > > And you'll realise ARAM only account is anything but a mythical unicorn. First timing a champ especially a hard one is a huge issue as it means you will fail and are useless to the team.
> [{quoted}](name=Rowanstar,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=uf3dwxsq,comment-id=000400000000,timestamp=2019-09-08T20:26:28.504+0000) > > First timing a champ especially a hard one is a huge issue as it means you will fail and are useless to the team. Not to forget that first timing never was “part of the experience“ for anything but the free rotation or the beginners with no champs. People use the concept of randomness as foundation for this asinine idea, saying it was “meant“ to be truly random when ARAM never was truly random from the very start. Especially not after they added rerolls. Fact is that making all champs available doesn't make ARAM any better. It just switches out one arguably lesser problem (if ARAM accounts even are a problem) for another, bigger one while also spitting on the people that enjoy the mode as it is. And why? Because people like OP get salty when they see Lux too often and want to remold the mode to even the ground for them because they found it necessary to buy every champ. Sounds like a wish made out of spite instead of reason to me. But hey, I've never seen a post that started with “I just played a game where...“ that didn't belong in the RANT subforum.
: "this isnt 'gamemode'"
Chill bruh, this isn't RANT.
Hotarµ (NA)
: >you can have point click CC. nothing bad about it. theres nothing wrong if 1-2 skills on a champion have no "counterplay" as long as the other 2 skills do have counterplay The problem is that champions with point & click CC are either: 1 - Impossible to balance because they have point & click CC 2 - Only picked/are relevant because of that CC I also feel the need to mention that yeah, point & clicks really don't have much counterplay. You have two options: Don't get in range of the ability or buy a QSS. There is no dodging, there is no baiting/juking the ability, there is nothing you can do except get hit or don't get hit, and that is not good game design to most people. >as long as the kit feels cool, feels fun, and is a good theme. fun to play. thats what matters ...no, gameplay and health matters as well. Just because a champion is fun, cool, and has a good theme does not mean they shouldn't be balanced in terms of gameplay. "Fun to play against" is very subjective and shouldn't be weighed as heavily, you could make the argument that it shouldn't be taken into account at all actually. But League of Legends is a _game_, the gameplay aspect of it is pretty important. >some champs had dumb kits. like old sion. old yorick. old poppy. they just felt stupid Care to elaborate? I'm kind of confused, why are old Sion and old Poppy stupid but current Fiddlesticks and current Mundo _not_ stupid? What specifically makes them less stupid? They were all from the same time period with glaring issues of their own, it sounds like you're just picking and choosing which champions should be changed.
> [{quoted}](name=Hotarµ,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=XzEUHefi,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2019-09-08T04:16:29.985+0000) > > The problem is that champions with point & click CC are either: > > 1 - Impossible to balance because they have point & click CC > 2 - Only picked/are relevant because of that CC > > I also feel the need to mention that yeah, point & clicks really don't have much counterplay. You have two options: Don't get in range of the ability or buy a QSS. There is no dodging, there is no baiting/juking the ability, there is nothing you can do except get hit or don't get hit, and that is not good game design to most people. > While I agree I also have to admit: there is nothing more satisfying than stopping a Yas, Akali, Fizz, Irelia, Pyke mid play with a single point&click to the face. Laughs in {{champion:90}} at every dashing miscreant.
: > [{quoted}](name=Madjack01,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=uf3dwxsq,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2019-09-08T09:10:43.494+0000) > > No. > > Actually facing people with limited champ pools and having unfair comps is what you signed up for. If you don't like it, too bad. > > People will never invest in the entire champion pool nor should they be forced too because you want to try to enforce fairness in a mode that is intrinsically unfair. I don't like to play more than 2/3s of the roster (and that includes nonsense like Jayce, Xerath or Ziggs). Even with a limited champ pool I have trouble getting a champ I enjoy. Might as well kiss goodbye to the mode if have to play all the shit I purposely avoided in all other modes by not buying them You got rerolls for that. Rerolls you'd be getting 1-2 of every game because with 140+ characters, you're bound to have the occasional one you dislike. And hey, unless you hate over 75% of the roster you're bound to get champs you either enjoy or don't mind playing a ton of the time. And naw, I didn't sign up for "limited champ pools and unfair comps every game". I signed up for "Everyone gets a random champion and you make do with a random team". The failure is on Riot for not putting forth what is advertised here. "ARAM" is all random all mid. Not "All certain champions I like to play all mid". But all this is proving is that Riot will just cater to those who think in a similar fashion: I only want to play 10 very specific (coincidentally poke) champions every single game and I'll keep droppin' them dollah dollah bills if ya give me what I want.
I was thinking of a reply up to this point: > [{quoted}](name=CaptainMårvelous,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=uf3dwxsq,comment-id=00020000,timestamp=2019-09-08T09:18:33.235+0000) > But all this is proving is that Riot will just cater to those who think in a similar fashion: I only want to play 10 very specific (coincidentally poke) champions every single game and I'll keep droppin' them dollah dollah bills if ya give me what I want. Might as well repost this thread in the RANT section because that's all it is.
: Reminder: Unlock all champions for ARAM
No. Actually facing people with limited champ pools and having unfair comps is what you signed up for. If you don't like it, too bad. People will never invest in the entire champion pool nor should they be forced too because you want to try to enforce fairness in a mode that is intrinsically unfair. I don't like to play more than 2/3s of the roster (and that includes nonsense like Jayce, Xerath or Ziggs). Even with a limited champ pool I have trouble getting a champ I enjoy. Might as well kiss goodbye to the mode if have to play all the shit I purposely avoided in all other modes by not buying them.
Comentários de Rioters
Exibir mais

Madjack01

Nível 105 (EUW)
Total de votos positivos
Criar uma discussão