: How often have you been pissed b/c a champ was too tanky?
: Guys I WAS KIDDING when I made the trashy over-simplified logo
: Anyone else feel like the anniversary is going to make or break league for the next ten years?
There is gonna be an event where you can earn up to 400 tokens to get a chroma or summoner icon for free, and the rest will be for RP including the new *Legendary Ultimate Super Prestige Edition Yasuo* skin for converted 200$ to show off your "accomplishment", as they called it. There is also going to be Urf with lots of bonus content to celebrate the anniversary with the players (but all for RP of course). And the event will end with what everyone has been wanting for years: The official announcement of Mobile Legends.
: How many games can you intentionally ruin before being banned?
: Yeah, Aatrox is still broken though. Now that I have refunded him you guys can go nerf him. Started playing Riven a bit on low level acc. She needs buffs early so I can 1 v 1 champs with 2 q combos. Now I have to use my brain( later not since I still fuck up combos but win). Also, Yasuo, who is a very hated champ has below 48 percent winrate in all elos exept Grandmaster(where Yassuo is) but people still whine. Meanwhile Riven has 54 percent winrate but nah that's only in Matsers. No people play her. She is the most picked champ. What are you on about. Not enoug matches but she is still the most picked champ in high elo and dominates others(included those supposed Garen and Darius mains in Challnger. Garen can hold her into a standstill in lane as she can't kill him but Darius. I bet all those Darius mains would rather fight a kennen than risk going against Riven, I also bet that they rarely play against Riven. Also to answer your question my numbers are from U.GG. I am not using OP.GG. If you look at that site you will simply think champs like Aatrox are still broken. Like I said, I don't personally hate Riven as the Rivens in my ello suck. As evident by the winrate in plat and diamond. My question for you is this. How can some champs like Aatrox be balanced around pro play and high elo but others(like Riven) get to have said godlike stats of 53-54 percent WR. In fact you said and I quote: "You take the master+ winrate of a champion that is heavily one tricked in that elos". Now, you fucked up with that argument. The reason Riven is heavily one tricked in those Elos is because "drums" she is broken free elo and the good players who fight other good players want to have this unfair advantage. Why doesn't Darius have a 54 percent winrate in Masters. Why is he below 50 percent. By your logic( and examples with some challenger darius mains) surely the Darius mains in masters will inflate his winrate, however they don't since he isn't free elo and those guys have to play all kinds of bruisers in order to climb. Rivens can play only their free elo champ. That is why they as you said "heavily one trick" said champ. Why not disregard high elo alltogether. TBH I would be happy because then Aatrox would get half his nerfs reverted as they are only based on his pro play. However, with champs like Aatrox they get nerfed cuz of high elo and pro play but Riven just gets to sit 6-7 percent above their winrate because she is not played in pro play. She gets to be broken because she blows you up at any mistake. That is hard at pro play so she aint gonna get nerfed. In order to balance our game we at Rito will consider pro play only. You actually gave me the argument with pro play. Who gives a shit. Toplane is meaningless there. The role of top is to survive. If he gets ahead then sure resourses are pulled there. The bot swaps with top for the herald and Top goes on the empty side of the map because it's just a meh lane. it becomes ok to gank if said laner gets a solo kill or something. Harass champs and sustain champs go there(that is the only reason Aatrox was being picked-because he could stay there and do his thing, not because he was broken or something, He just had sustain. Riven isn't a harass or sustain champ and is not suited for top. same reason why Darius after season 5 is not picked-he can't sustain reliably and doesn't have range.). Those facts don't affect soloq balance or balance at all. The pros care about comps and objectives, so they put priority in effective comp picks to complement the other picks. Soloq you have to carry. Riven is one of said carries, along with others. She is not a comp pick and that is why almost no one plays her in pro play. Doesn't change her soloq power and your argument about her balance is irrelevant. i couldn't care less what the pros played. I want the other 99.99 percent of games to be balanced. The pros will play for team composition and early to mid game for the majority of the time. You keep thinking you are right. And btw her WR is always 54 up in high elo, regardless of matches. In has never gone to 47 or 48 because of bad matches. let Riven be broken cuz it's visible only in high elo. Sure many people play and lower her WR, but that is true for all popular champs. > [{quoted}](name=Who Fed Ru,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=Hwj4xhlI,comment-id=00000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-09-13T14:59:13.543+0000) > > No she doesn't lmao. > > She has 47.38% general. > 48.82% in plat. > 49.53% in diamond. > > Source: op.gg. > > I would rly like to see where you pull your stats from. > > The only place where she has that kind of wr you are making her to have is Master+, a place in which winrates don't matter because they are inaccurate af because of small sample size and the fact that there are a lot of Riven one tricks in the highest elos. > > Or do you want to nerf Vel'Koz too because he has >70% wr in chall and call it "objectively complaining"? > > hahahahahahah. > Your whole statement already showed that you have 0 knowledge of balance. > > You take the master+ winrate of a champion that is heavily one tricked in that elos and call that a reason for a nerf, despite her not even being good in pro play. Yeah, Aatrox is still broken though. Now that I have refunded him you guys can go nerf him. Started playing Riven a bit on low level acc. She needs buffs early so I can 1 v 1 champs with 2 q combos. Now I have to use my brain( later not since I still fuck up combos but win). Also, Yasuo, who is a very hated champ has below 48 percent winrate in all elos exept Grandmaster(where Yassuo is) but people still whine. Meanwhile Riven has 54 percent winrate but nah that's only in Matsers. No people play her. She is the most picked champ. What are you on about. Not enoug matches but she is still the most picked champ in high elo and dominates others(included those supposed Garen and Darius mains in Challnger. Garen can hold her into a standstill in lane as she can't kill him but Darius. I bet all those Darius mains would rather fight a kennen than risk going against Riven, I also bet that they rarely play against Riven. Also to answer your question my numbers are from U.GG. I am not using OP.GG. If you look at that site you will simply think champs like Aatrox are still broken. Like I said, I don't personally hate Riven as the Rivens in my ello suck. As evident by the winrate in plat and diamond. My question for you is this. How can some champs like Aatrox be balanced around pro play and high elo but others(like Riven) get to have said godlike stats of 53-54 percent WR. In fact you said and I quote: "You take the master+ winrate of a champion that is heavily one tricked in that elos". Now, you fucked up with that argument. The reason Riven is heavily one tricked in those Elos is because "drums" she is broken free elo and the good players who fight other good players want to have this unfair advantage. Why doesn't Darius have a 54 percent winrate in Masters. Why is he below 50 percent. By your logic( and examples with some challenger darius mains) surely the Darius mains in masters will inflate his winrate, however they don't since he isn't free elo and those guys have to play all kinds of bruisers in order to climb. Rivens can play only their free elo champ. That is why they as you said "heavily one trick" said champ. Why not disregard high elo alltogether. TBH I would be happy because then Aatrox would get half his nerfs reverted as they are only based on his pro play. However, with champs like Aatrox they get nerfed cuz of high elo and pro play but Riven just gets to sit 6-7 percent above their winrate because she is not played in pro play. She gets to be broken because she blows you up at any mistake. That is hard at pro play so she aint gonna get nerfed. In order to balance our game we at Rito will consider pro play only. You actually gave me the argument with pro play. Who gives a shit. Toplane is meaningless there. The role of top is to survive. If he gets ahead then sure resourses are pulled there. The bot swaps with top for the herald and Top goes on the empty side of the map because it's just a meh lane. it becomes ok to gank if said laner gets a solo kill or something. Harass champs and sustain champs go there(that is the only reason Aatrox was being picked-because he could stay there and do his thing, not because he was broken or something, He just had sustain. Riven isn't a harass or sustain champ and is not suited for top. same reason why Darius after season 5 is not picked-he can't sustain reliably and doesn't have range.). Those facts don't affect soloq balance or balance at all. The pros care about comps and objectives, so they put priority in effective comp picks to complement the other picks. Soloq you have to carry. Riven is one of said carries, along with others. She is not a comp pick and that is why almost no one plays her in pro play. Doesn't change her soloq power and your argument about her balance is irrelevant. i couldn't care less what the pros played. I want the other 99.99 percent of games to be balanced. The pros will play for team composition and early to mid game for the majority of the time. You keep thinking you are right. And btw her WR is always 54 up in high elo, regardless of matches. In has never gone to 47 or 48 because of bad matches. let Riven be broken cuz it's visible only in high elo. Sure many people play and lower her WR, but that is true for all popular champs.
> [{quoted}](name=TeodorusofNoxus,realm=EUNE,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=Hwj4xhlI,comment-id=000000000000000000000001,timestamp=2019-09-15T07:17:00.052+0000) > > Yeah, Aatrox is still broken though. Now that I have refunded him you guys can go nerf him. Started playing Riven a bit on low level acc. She needs buffs early so I can 1 v 1 champs with 2 q combos. Now I have to use my brain( later not since I still fuck up combos but win). Also, Yasuo, who is a very hated champ has below 48 percent winrate in all elos exept Grandmaster(where Yassuo is) but people still whine. Meanwhile Riven has 54 percent winrate but nah that's only in Matsers. No people play her. She is the most picked champ. What are you on about. Not enoug matches but she is still the most picked champ in high elo and dominates others(included those supposed Garen and Darius mains in Challnger. Garen can hold her into a standstill in lane as she can't kill him but Darius. I bet all those Darius mains would rather fight a kennen than risk going against Riven, I also bet that they rarely play against Riven. > Also to answer your question my numbers are from U.GG. I am not using OP.GG. If you look at that site you will simply think champs like Aatrox are still broken. Like I said, I don't personally hate Riven as the Rivens in my ello suck. As evident by the winrate in plat and diamond. My question for you is this. How can some champs like Aatrox be balanced around pro play and high elo but others(like Riven) get to have said godlike stats of 53-54 percent WR. > In fact you said and I quote: "You take the master+ winrate of a champion that is heavily one tricked in that elos". Now, you fucked up with that argument. The reason Riven is heavily one tricked in those Elos is because "drums" she is broken free elo and the good players who fight other good players want to have this unfair advantage. Why doesn't Darius have a 54 percent winrate in Masters. Why is he below 50 percent. By your logic( and examples with some challenger darius mains) surely the Darius mains in masters will inflate his winrate, however they don't since he isn't free elo and those guys have to play all kinds of bruisers in order to climb. Rivens can play only their free elo champ. That is why they as you said "heavily one trick" said champ. Why not disregard high elo alltogether. TBH I would be happy because then Aatrox would get half his nerfs reverted as they are only based on his pro play. However, with champs like Aatrox they get nerfed cuz of high elo and pro play but Riven just gets to sit 6-7 percent above their winrate because she is not played in pro play. She gets to be broken because she blows you up at any mistake. That is hard at pro play so she aint gonna get nerfed. In order to balance our game we at Rito will consider pro play only. > You actually gave me the argument with pro play. Who gives a shit. Toplane is meaningless there. The role of top is to survive. If he gets ahead then sure resourses are pulled there. The bot swaps with top for the herald and Top goes on the empty side of the map because it's just a meh lane. it becomes ok to gank if said laner gets a solo kill or something. Harass champs and sustain champs go there(that is the only reason Aatrox was being picked-because he could stay there and do his thing, not because he was broken or something, He just had sustain. Riven isn't a harass or sustain champ and is not suited for top. same reason why Darius after season 5 is not picked-he can't sustain reliably and doesn't have range.). Those facts don't affect soloq balance or balance at all. The pros care about comps and objectives, so they put priority in effective comp picks to complement the other picks. Soloq you have to carry. Riven is one of said carries, along with others. She is not a comp pick and that is why almost no one plays her in pro play. Doesn't change her soloq power and your argument about her balance is irrelevant. i couldn't care less what the pros played. I want the other 99.99 percent of games to be balanced. The pros will play for team composition and early to mid game for the majority of the time. > You keep thinking you are right. And btw her WR is always 54 up in high elo, regardless of matches. In has never gone to 47 or 48 because of bad matches. > let Riven be broken cuz it's visible only in high elo. Sure many people play and lower her WR, but that is true for all popular champs. > > Yeah, Aatrox is still broken though. Now that I have refunded him you guys can go nerf him. Started playing Riven a bit on low level acc. She needs buffs early so I can 1 v 1 champs with 2 q combos. Now I have to use my brain( later not since I still fuck up combos but win). Also, Yasuo, who is a very hated champ has below 48 percent winrate in all elos exept Grandmaster(where Yassuo is) but people still whine. Meanwhile Riven has 54 percent winrate but nah that's only in Matsers. No people play her. She is the most picked champ. What are you on about. Not enoug matches but she is still the most picked champ in high elo and dominates others(included those supposed Garen and Darius mains in Challnger. Garen can hold her into a standstill in lane as she can't kill him but Darius. I bet all those Darius mains would rather fight a kennen than risk going against Riven, I also bet that they rarely play against Riven. > Also to answer your question my numbers are from U.GG. I am not using OP.GG. If you look at that site you will simply think champs like Aatrox are still broken. Like I said, I don't personally hate Riven as the Rivens in my ello suck. As evident by the winrate in plat and diamond. My question for you is this. How can some champs like Aatrox be balanced around pro play and high elo but others(like Riven) get to have said godlike stats of 53-54 percent WR. > In fact you said and I quote: "You take the master+ winrate of a champion that is heavily one tricked in that elos". Now, you fucked up with that argument. The reason Riven is heavily one tricked in those Elos is because "drums" she is broken free elo and the good players who fight other good players want to have this unfair advantage. Why doesn't Darius have a 54 percent winrate in Masters. Why is he below 50 percent. By your logic( and examples with some challenger darius mains) surely the Darius mains in masters will inflate his winrate, however they don't since he isn't free elo and those guys have to play all kinds of bruisers in order to climb. Rivens can play only their free elo champ. That is why they as you said "heavily one trick" said champ. Why not disregard high elo alltogether. TBH I would be happy because then Aatrox would get half his nerfs reverted as they are only based on his pro play. However, with champs like Aatrox they get nerfed cuz of high elo and pro play but Riven just gets to sit 6-7 percent above their winrate because she is not played in pro play. She gets to be broken because she blows you up at any mistake. That is hard at pro play so she aint gonna get nerfed. In order to balance our game we at Rito will consider pro play only. > You actually gave me the argument with pro play. Who gives a shit. Toplane is meaningless there. The role of top is to survive. If he gets ahead then sure resourses are pulled there. The bot swaps with top for the herald and Top goes on the empty side of the map because it's just a meh lane. it becomes ok to gank if said laner gets a solo kill or something. Harass champs and sustain champs go there(that is the only reason Aatrox was being picked-because he could stay there and do his thing, not because he was broken or something, He just had sustain. Riven isn't a harass or sustain champ and is not suited for top. same reason why Darius after season 5 is not picked-he can't sustain reliably and doesn't have range.). Those facts don't affect soloq balance or balance at all. The pros care about comps and objectives, so they put priority in effective comp picks to complement the other picks. Soloq you have to carry. Riven is one of said carries, along with others. She is not a comp pick and that is why almost no one plays her in pro play. Doesn't change her soloq power and your argument about her balance is irrelevant. i couldn't care less what the pros played. I want the other 99.99 percent of games to be balanced. The pros will play for team composition and early to mid game for the majority of the time. > You keep thinking you are right. And btw her WR is always 54 up in high elo, regardless of matches. In has never gone to 47 or 48 because of bad matches. > let Riven be broken cuz it's visible only in high elo. Sure many people play and lower her WR, but that is true for all popular champs. Ah I'm always forgetting that we are on boards here. I'm sorry, I'm gonna make up for it. You are totally right, Riven is broken af, and she always was. Her one tricks obviously only play her for that reason, and not for any other reason. They know that they don't have to worry about nerfs because there are two high elo Riven one tricks in Riots balance team, so she is safe from nerfs and will always get buffs when needed. She is Riots favorite child after all. I only defended her because I like to abuse her, I picked her up last week and climbed to masters in just two days because she is literally so easy to play, I have a solid 82% winrate on her. Like you said, the champion isn't hard to play at all, which I noticed pretty quickly when I was winning lane by just facerolling the whole lane phase. Believe me or not, in one game I literally had to go afk for 5 minutes but my cat walked over the keyboard and when I came back I had a pentakill and baron. It's just so stupid that Riot thinks that is ok. In just a few hours in master tier I have noticed that the whole meta there just resolves about which team gets Riven, as she is free win if she doesn't have like 2 afks in her team or something. Anyways, cya in challenger!
: You realize she has 54 percent winrate, right. I complain objectively, not subjectively. I do not hate Riven as the Gold or hell even low plat Rivens I fight fuck up their combos and get dunked on by yours truly. I fuck Riven, but the champ is still busted. The fact that you deny this shows your lack of game knowledge and balance. Sure animation cancelling is bit hard but even I(a gold player) learned it after a few days of practice- not all day of course. The Rivens I fight can NOT animation cancel. If I ever meet a Riven who can do this I just can't do shit. Even those who can't animation cancel are beasts late game at max Cdr.
> [{quoted}](name=TeodorusofNoxus,realm=EUNE,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=Hwj4xhlI,comment-id=0000000000000000,timestamp=2019-09-13T11:00:45.495+0000) > > You realize she has 54 percent winrate, right. I complain objectively, not subjectively. I do not hate Riven as the Gold or hell even low plat Rivens I fight fuck up their combos and get dunked on by yours truly. I fuck Riven, but the champ is still busted. The fact that you deny this shows your lack of game knowledge and balance. Sure animation cancelling is bit hard but even I(a gold player) learned it after a few days of practice- not all day of course. The Rivens I fight can NOT animation cancel. If I ever meet a Riven who can do this I just can't do shit. Even those who can't animation cancel are beasts late game at max Cdr. No she doesn't lmao. She has 47.38% general. 48.82% in plat. 49.53% in diamond. Source: op.gg. I would rly like to see where you pull your stats from. The only place where she has that kind of wr you are making her to have is Master+, a place in which winrates don't matter because they are inaccurate af because of small sample size and the fact that there are a lot of Riven one tricks in the highest elos. Or do you want to nerf Vel'Koz too because he has >70% wr in chall and call it "objectively complaining"? > The fact that you deny this shows your lack of game knowledge and balance hahahahahahah. Your whole statement already showed that you have 0 knowledge of balance. You take the master+ winrate of a champion that is heavily one tricked in that elos and call that a reason for a nerf, despite her not even being good in pro play.
: Excusez-moi. The fuck is this. Riot unironically buffs the champ, while at the same time nerfing Aatrox( bassically worse version of Riven, without a shield or nuke on his R). And of course someone downvoted my completely reasonable post. Maybe I should suggest we buff Riven's R to do "Truly true damage". This new form of damage kills said tagets hit by her R recast regardless of Hp or resistances. :D. That way I will get those upvotes. Now seriously maybe I should start maining this free elo champ and main her until she gets nerfed. Oh wait, unlike Aatrox she isn't popular in pro play and she will never be nerfed and I will reach Diamond despite not desrving it. Muahahahaha. :D :D :D. Maybe if their only toplaner in the balance team wasn't a Riven main things would be different. meanwhile Aatrox at 45 WR( BROKEN-must nerf.).
> [{quoted}](name=TeodorusofNoxus,realm=EUNE,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=Hwj4xhlI,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2019-09-12T23:31:03.802+0000) > > Excusez-moi. The fuck is this. Riot unironically buffs the champ, while at the same time nerfing Aatrox( bassically worse version of Riven, without a shield or nuke on his R). And of course someone downvoted my completely reasonable post. Maybe I should suggest we buff Riven's R to do "Truly true damage". This new form of damage kills said tagets hit by her R recast regardless of Hp or resistances. :D. That way I will get those upvotes. Now seriously maybe I should start maining this free elo champ and main her until she gets nerfed. Oh wait, unlike Aatrox she isn't popular in pro play and she will never be nerfed and I will reach Diamond despite not desrving it. Muahahahaha. :D :D :D. Maybe if their only toplaner in the balance team wasn't a Riven main things would be different. > meanwhile Aatrox at 45 WR( BROKEN-must nerf.). Your "completely reasonable" post is just whining about a champ you don't like, like 99% of the posts here. I'm kinda glad Riot buffs her so you guys have more stuff to complain about xd
: Riven balance
She has buffs on PBE hahahahahahahhaha
Tailypo (NA)
: it looks like it needs a nerf
> [{quoted}](name=Tailypo,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=ryEuV0pp,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-09-12T22:54:33.459+0000) > > it looks like it needs a nerf You are gonna love these news, she has buffs on pbe xd
: We need this music in champion select again
Barkley (NA)
: You wanna hear a joke?
You wanna hear a joke? **TSM** KEKW
BluWise (NA)
: Nerf Fizz
the game shouldn't be balanced with focus on low elo
: Again, stop buffing Lee Sin everytime before Worlds
Worlds are the only thing that matters anyway, the game is far beyond saving
Nubrac (NA)
: Nightblue Copyright Claims and Blocks 1 Mil View Video in Which He Gets Riot Friend to Ban Nubrac
: Walk around your neighbourhood safely
GigglesO (NA)
: I thnk assassins are uninteractive
: > [{quoted}](name=Moody P,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=mJN82vq2,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2019-09-01T17:31:39.875+0000) > > Exhaust is exactly as strong as it should be and is perfectly valuable in the situations it's supposed to be used in. The issue is that situation isn’t hardly relevant anymore. Sure. You reduced that assassins damage damage by 40%. Too bad it didn’t matter cause he’s overkilling by almost 2x a health bar.
> [{quoted}](name=The thigh guy,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=mJN82vq2,comment-id=00010000,timestamp=2019-09-01T17:48:29.638+0000) > > The issue is that situation isn’t hardly relevant anymore. > > Sure. You reduced that assassins damage damage by 40%. Too bad it didn’t matter cause he’s overkilling by almost 2x a health bar. ye and on top of that he kills your whole team with one spell and does baron solo with two autos. deez OP Assassins rito nerf pliz G_G
: Is it just me or is the quality of the game going downhill hard
: Why is it so popular... to do Baron...
it's easier to do jungle camps with baron destroying the nexus is overrated anyway tbh
: ROLL UP. SIGN UP TO THE WRONG REGION AND THEN PAY TO CHANGE
You do know that you are not forbidden to create a new account?
: ***
> [{quoted}](name=Sewer Side,realm=OCE,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=zij79YiX,comment-id=00020004000000000000,timestamp=2019-08-22T18:19:13.531+0000) > > You mistake my words. I didn’t say I defended Eternals. I’m saying lack of action by Boards despite all the conspiracies (eternals death recap fix and new skins = buff champions) is stupid. > > But I get reading comprehension is super low here and y’all get rabid by anyone challenging the hivemind if you say so
: > [{quoted}](name=Who Fed Ru,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=zij79YiX,comment-id=00020004,timestamp=2019-08-21T22:00:53.472+0000) > > I did xd > > The fact that there is just one ridiculous cash grab coming after another showed (or more, confirmed to) me that they actually don't give a fuck about this game anymore apart from how much money they can make until the last player leaves. > > Won't take long until more and more players realize that. Oh boy, a level 34 account who can’t stop posting on league forums despite “quitting” what are the odds. The fact you have to prove you quit but still log in here is even more sad than my first fact, lmao
> [{quoted}](name=Sewer Side,realm=OCE,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=zij79YiX,comment-id=000200040000,timestamp=2019-08-22T00:49:22.411+0000) > > Oh boy, a level 34 account who can’t stop posting on league forums despite “quitting” what are the odds. > > The fact you have to prove you quit but still log in here is even more sad than my first fact, lmao I mean, I'm still around here and watch LCS and LEC, I just stopped playing myself, wheres the problem? I don't even see what your point here is and why you are even defending that stupid cash grab system, lmao
Ñaofumi (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=Who Fed Ru,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=Ipskodxz,comment-id=000a,timestamp=2019-08-21T22:42:36.800+0000) > > mAgEs gOoD nInJa mAn bAd If you think mage players dont dislike other mages then you are dead wrong. I mean people were shit talking {{champion:8}} and {{champion:142}} for ages now
> [{quoted}](name=Ñaofumi,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=Ipskodxz,comment-id=000a0000,timestamp=2019-08-21T22:51:59.334+0000) > > If you think mage players dont dislike other mages then you are dead wrong. I mean people were shit talking {{champion:8}} and {{champion:142}} for ages now xd
Ñaofumi (NA)
: Can we buff the other anti-assassin mids please?
KazKaz (OCE)
: Why is Spear of Shojin still in the game?
because they added it to the game and didn't remove it again
Zed Boss (NA)
: "Why did you ban my champion?" Answer: "Oh cry me a river"
calls for {{champion:20}} {{summoner:1}} {{summoner:12}}
: Its not "I am Jhin bolt", its "i am the fast". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BrP0H-n0x3Q
> [{quoted}](name=Thefrostyviking,realm=EUW,application-id=Ir7ZrJjF,discussion-id=EctAU9hq,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2019-08-21T15:05:41.883+0000) > > Its not "I am Jhin bolt", its "i am the fast". > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BrP0H-n0x3Q Never fear, the Fast is here
: So how many of y’all quitting over this then? None? K Downvotes aren’t calls to action, hunties. That’s just cognitive dissonance and admitting I’m right
> [{quoted}](name=Sewer Side,realm=OCE,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=zij79YiX,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2019-08-21T10:53:52.085+0000) > > So how many of y’all quitting over this then? > > None? K > > Downvotes aren’t calls to action, hunties. That’s just cognitive dissonance and admitting I’m right I did xd The fact that there is just one ridiculous cash grab coming after another showed (or more, confirmed to) me that they actually don't give a fuck about this game anymore apart from how much money they can make until the last player leaves. Won't take long until more and more players realize that.
Era Teemo (EUW)
: >The best part is that you don't even see that the system is flawed to begin with. It would never work, it would only increase toxicity if at all. Not correct, I think there is 72% it will be success (if happens) and 28% to not. Lets stay in biggest number of 72%. >And how will it decrease toxicity if some players just take your LP from you just to maximize their own gains, what will 100% happen. Own games? You take their LP or give them extra. There is no own gain. >It's a shitty design to begin with to let other players affect your LP gains at all, it would only be tilting if you perform well but still get some LP less because you know how this community is. If you perform well, then that player can be blocked for next x games in just 2 games. If you do not then, where is problem? You played bad / good in other person eyes.
> [{quoted}](name=Era Teemo,realm=EUW,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=fAH3jLJN,comment-id=00010000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-08-21T13:47:29.369+0000) > > It would never work, it would only increase toxicity if at all. > > Not correct, I think there is 72% it will be success (if happens) and 28% to not. Lets stay in biggest number of 72%. > > Own games? You take their LP or give them extra. There is no own gain. > > If you perform well, then that player can be blocked for next x games in just 2 games. If you do not then, where is problem? You played bad / good in other person eyes. Oh thought you meant you take it away from them and get it yourself. But still, the system would just be frustrated. Just like the honor system, it feels so random when you get honored or when you don't. Sometimes you just get randomly 3 honors despite not doing shit, sometimes you don't get any at all despite performing and acting nice. I rly don't want my LP gains to be affected by my teammates at all, it would just be frustrating.
Era Teemo (EUW)
: You are just talking how it is gonna be abused and you do not how? >People will always find ways to use the system in the most effective way to maximize their own LP gains, and not in a fair way. GL you will get random 9 teammates, also if all gonna max their LP (I include entire database of players here) and much decrease toxicity, then is worth. Because numbers are numbers, if all players have 1000LP more is same as all have 0LP more, but if I can decrease toxicity with this little thing then that will improve game. >There will be people finding the ideal way to use it without the system detecting you as an abuser. Will you hack into server and increase your LP by 10?
> [{quoted}](name=Era Teemo,realm=EUW,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=fAH3jLJN,comment-id=000100000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-08-21T13:30:39.801+0000) > > You are just talking how it is gonna be abused and you do not how? > > GL you will get random 9 teammates, also if all gonna max their LP (I include entire database of players here) and much decrease toxicity, then is worth. > > Because numbers are numbers, if all players have 1000LP more is same as all have 0LP more, but if I can decrease toxicity with this little thing then that will improve game. > > Will you hack into server and increase your LP by 10? The best part is that you don't even see that the system is flawed to begin with. It would never work, it would only increase toxicity if at all. > Because numbers are numbers, if all players have 1000LP more is same as all have 0LP more, but if I can decrease toxicity with this little thing then that will improve game. And how will it decrease toxicity if some players just take your LP from you just to maximize their own gains, what will 100% happen. It's a shitty design to begin with to let other players affect your LP gains at all, it would only be tilting if you perform well but still get some LP less because you know how this community is.
Era Teemo (EUW)
: In background will be LIMIT_NUMBER and iy you use that to much that player will get extra -2LP per next x games. So you get nothing from abusing this.
> [{quoted}](name=Era Teemo,realm=EUW,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=fAH3jLJN,comment-id=0001000000000000,timestamp=2019-08-21T12:39:03.395+0000) > > In background will be LIMIT_NUMBER and iy you use that to much that player will get extra -2LP per next x games. So you get nothing from abusing this. People will always find ways to use the system in the most effective way to maximize their own LP gains, and not in a fair way. There will be people finding the ideal way to use it without the system detecting you as an abuser. And then there is also the question from which point it is abusing. There are quite a lot of games where all your teammates are actual garbage. Not to mention that a system like that would be bullshit to begin with for obvious reasons.
Era Teemo (EUW)
: Who said they will not try to abuse, but when someone starts using that to much he /she will be blocked from punish /reward others and he / she will lose -2LP during next x games as bonus.
> [{quoted}](name=Era Teemo,realm=EUW,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=fAH3jLJN,comment-id=00010000,timestamp=2019-08-21T11:55:51.162+0000) > > Who said they will not try to abuse, but when someone starts using that to much he /she will be blocked from punish /reward others and he / she will lose -2LP during next x games as bonus. everyone would still try to get as much lp out of it as they can
Era Teemo (EUW)
: Punishment
totally wouldn't be abused /s
: riiight... but uh... Evelynn can do the same thing, but she has an escape. So if your goal is to build J4 like an assassin, why wouldn't you pick Evelynn or something.
> [{quoted}](name=POG IRL,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=A1ABqnVT,comment-id=00020000,timestamp=2019-08-20T13:24:18.994+0000) > > riiight... but uh... Evelynn can do the same thing, but she has an escape. So if your goal is to build J4 like an assassin, why wouldn't you pick Evelynn or something. J4 has an epic pre6 already, he can already start camping lanes from level2 onwards and snowball early. If he already has one, or even a few kills once he hits 6 he can OS basically everything from that point until he falls off.
: What is J4 even good at?
one shotting and pissing off the enemy mid until he ragequits
Lucasman (NA)
: champs without mana shouldnt be able to buy items with mana
: i guess youre not around long enough to know, but the boards used to be a very helpful place for riot. until some day riot was like "fuck you we now got lol reddit" and you might be able to understand that the boards werent happy about that
> [{quoted}](name=Jennifer420,realm=EUW,application-id=LqLKtMpN,discussion-id=EgyEEUe0,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2019-08-19T19:22:33.779+0000) > > i guess youre not around long enough to know, but the boards used to be a very helpful place for riot. until some day riot was like "fuck you we now got lol reddit" and you might be able to understand that the boards werent happy about that I've been around quite a while, but my main got banned xd But the gameplay forums actually being useful is years ago. And it definitely wasn't riot going "fuck you we now got lol reddit" It was the community and that basically all tank and mage mains started to gather here not even wanting to make any meaningful discussions. One liner about mages being weak? -> +80 Upvotes Armor is useless. -> Upvoted. Nerf Wind and ninjaman. -> To hot with you And if you say anything, just anything against it, no matter how many statistics and facts you use to underline your arguments, enjoy being downvoted. After that started Riot abandoned this shithole, and now people are pissed about it and actually wondering why. That's what happened. Just saying that no one needs to act surprised about the fact that Riot uses other platforms for actually meaningful feedback.
: friend list gone and stuns act like slows, but lol reddit keeps defending riot
if you ppl here would actually make meaningful posts and not just circlejerk around mages and tanks all day maybe riot would start to take this forum here serious too, just saying.
Youngcuck (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=Who Fed Ru,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=mi17oUWE,comment-id=00000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-08-16T11:44:26.970+0000) > > It does tho. > > Her late game damage is horrible for the fact that she has to fully commit into the enemy team to pull it off, AND having to set up the daggers first. Katarina is the only assassin in the game whose entire kit deals massive AOE damage. And honestly she has an easier time in teamfights since its very difficult to fight 4 people while also keeping track of Kata's daggers because if you get hit by one in the late game, youre either dead or forced out of the fight.
> [{quoted}](name=Youngcuck,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=mi17oUWE,comment-id=000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-08-16T12:20:42.548+0000) > > Katarina is the only assassin in the game whose entire kit deals massive AOE damage. And honestly she has an easier time in teamfights since its very difficult to fight 4 people while also keeping track of Kata's daggers because if you get hit by one in the late game, youre either dead or forced out of the fight. tbh I'm kind of done with that kind of discussions so I'm just gonna agree with you. Katarina is ridiculously OP, I honestly don't know what Riot was thinking when balancing that champion. You can literally just pick her up and easily get to challenger with her even if you only have low gold skills because she is that OP. Her whole kit just is a failure in design and broken as hell to begin with, even a braindead monkey can play her and do well. She is strong at all phases in the game and can get free pentas by just facerolling, you might as well go afk if she gets one kill as she will 1v5 from that point anyway without even needing skill. The literally only way to counter her is by banning her. It also doesn't look like Riot will nerf her anytime soon as half of Riot are probably Kata mains. The champion is even banned in pro play because there is no way to counter her even at the highest levels of play, that's why you never see one in LCS. Imo the champion should just be removed but that won't happen because Riot is playing favorites, so for now I guess I'll just have to stick to banning her because it's autoloss if the enemies get her.
Youngcuck (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=Who Fed Ru,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=mi17oUWE,comment-id=000000000000,timestamp=2019-08-16T11:27:15.164+0000) > > Well she is an early game champion, if she doesn't get ahead she will be useless because she doesn't bring anything to the team apart from damage. She isn't good at split pushing, has no cc, and her late game is horrible as her damage falls off. > > So even if she get's ahead, the longer the game goes, the more useless she gets. > > If you are an immobile champion vs her then just farm and stay away from her, her Q range isn't that great. ''Her damage falls off'' that actually made me giggle.
> [{quoted}](name=Youngcuck,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=mi17oUWE,comment-id=0000000000000000,timestamp=2019-08-16T11:40:54.161+0000) > > ''Her damage falls off'' that actually made me giggle. It does tho. Her late game damage is horrible for the fact that she has to fully commit into the enemy team to pull it off, AND having to set up the daggers first.
Youngcuck (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=Who Fed Ru,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=mi17oUWE,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-08-16T10:58:12.876+0000) > > The circle isn't the hitbox nor does it have anything to do with it. > It's the pickup range. > > Because it would be useless af else. > The whole champion literally wouldn't work anymore. Ok, so what is Katarinas weakness then? In lane she is hard to punish due to her insane mobility, she has good trades even pre lvl 6, she is almost impossible to kill due to the blinks, after she gets gunblade she can 100-0 any squishy in the blink of an eye and you cant really dodge her dagger hitbox unless youre a mobile champion. You can CC her ult? Yeah you can but it doesnt really matter, I've had games where the Katarina kills someone so fast you dont even have time to aim your cc at her. Defend her as much as you want but she feeds off of the lack of good teamplay in soloQ, and she's extremely hard to deal with.
> [{quoted}](name=Youngcuck,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=mi17oUWE,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2019-08-16T11:07:26.286+0000) > > Ok, so what is Katarinas weakness then? In lane she is hard to punish due to her insane mobility, she has good trades even pre lvl 6, she is almost impossible to kill due to the blinks, after she gets gunblade she can 100-0 any squishy in the blink of an eye and you cant really dodge her dagger hitbox unless youre a mobile champion. > > You can CC her ult? Yeah you can but it doesnt really matter, I've had games where the Katarina kills someone so fast you dont even have time to aim your cc at her. > > Defend her as much as you want but she feeds off of the lack of good teamplay in soloQ, and she's extremely hard to deal with. Well she is an early game champion, if she doesn't get ahead she will be useless because she doesn't bring anything to the team apart from damage. She isn't good at split pushing, has no cc, and her late game is horrible as her damage falls off. So even if she get's ahead, the longer the game goes, the more useless she gets. If you are an immobile champion vs her then just farm and stay away from her, her Q range isn't that great.
Sukishoo (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=Who Fed Ru,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=RjMNjVJA,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2019-08-16T09:50:48.003+0000) > > Don't even bother with it. > > Just fuck this game and this company, we know it's dying, Riot knows it's dying and that's why they try to milk out every last cent they can get with it. Yeah, "dying" yet you're still here hm.. People keep saying this when they still come here, most still even play the game.. How is it dying if you still care enough to complain?
> [{quoted}](name=Sukishoo,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=RjMNjVJA,comment-id=00010000,timestamp=2019-08-16T10:57:27.139+0000) > > Yeah, "dying" yet you're still here hm.. > > People keep saying this when they still come here, most still even play the game.. How is it dying if you still care enough to complain? It's not dead yet, but it's definitely on the downfall. I prob won't be around much longer anyway, I'm barely still playing myself and am only watching LEC and LCS anymore, and the biggest reason for that is that everytime they release something new that sounds cool on paper is behind a paywall, so I don't even bother with it anymore. I mean, that whole Eternal things sounds cool too if it would be accessable for everyone, but ofc you have to pay for it so it completely loses any meaning it would have. You don't show off your champion mastery with it, you show off that you are an idiot that actually bought it and supported Riot with it. Just saying that Riot knows what is happening so there is no reason to bother with it, they just try to get every cent out of it as long as they still can. Such cheap cash grabs won't be healthy for the game long time, sooner or later people will be done with having to pay for every shit. At this point it wouldn't even surprise me if the next time they do URF you have to pay to play it. Or that ARAM suddenly becomes a paid DLC.
Youngcuck (EUW)
: Katarina's dagger hitbox is absurd
The circle isn't the hitbox nor does it have anything to do with it. It's the pickup range. > Why in hell is Katarina able to blink to the edges of the circle and make the hitbox of the dagger start around Katarinas model and not around the dagger circle itself. Because it would be useless af else. The whole champion literally wouldn't work anymore.
: Petition to make Eternals Free
Don't even bother with it. Just fuck this game and this company, we know it's dying, Riot knows it's dying and that's why they try to milk out every last cent they can get with it.
: Boards > Reddit
: How do I handle Fizz as being Velkoz?
Don't pick Vel into Fizz, and first picking him is risky in general. If you are stuck with that matchup get {{item:2423}} and use it if he hits his ult, but always try to dodge it and stay far away. If he hits it when you don't have Stopwatch (anymore) u probably ded, even under tower if he doesn't fuck up. Flashing in the right moment might safe you too tho, but don't rely on it. Oh and I would take {{summoner:21}} as second summoner to survive the burst. Your job is basically to just farm the lane phase and not int, don't try to ever take lane prio or go aggressive after level 3 if he didn't fuck up heavily and you are 100% sure you get the kill, and always try to set up some river vision when you can for your team as he will try to roam because you play passive.
: Yes i do quit many games when i play top lane and get to be first pick
HàrrowR (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=Who Fed Ru,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=2uYEQyEh,comment-id=000100000000,timestamp=2019-07-26T00:36:30.329+0000) > > dafuq? > > That is an entirely different topic. > Should level 23 smurfs be put into matches with real low levels and ruin the experience there for actual new players or what? > > If his MMR is plat level he gets put into plat matches, dunno where the problem there is. > I don't rly see your point here and what you are complaining about. > You can only play Ranked from level30 onward anyway. The thing is they are ruining the experience for anyone regardless of level and these people seem like they are REALLY lvl 23 and not smurfs for one, and for two even those that are smurfs are always flaming and afking, yeah it doesn't sound fair to put them with the new players either but the offset would be that at least as you level up there's almost zero chance of any of these low level players or smurfs being in your game flaming and inting. As the game is now, trying to play a normal game to relax and try different stuff out is impossible cause every damn game you'll have yourself a lvl 20 that goes afk after dying once or starts running down mid, what does he care he's probably been banned 5 times already and is getting a kick out of it
> [{quoted}](name=HàrrowR,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=2uYEQyEh,comment-id=0001000000000000,timestamp=2019-07-26T01:12:13.396+0000) > > The thing is they are ruining the experience for anyone regardless of level and these people seem like they are REALLY lvl 23 and not smurfs for one, and for two even those that are smurfs are always flaming and afking, yeah it doesn't sound fair to put them with the new players either but the offset would be that at least as you level up there's almost zero chance of any of these low level players or smurfs being in your game flaming and inting. > > As the game is now, trying to play a normal game to relax and try different stuff out is impossible cause every damn game you'll have yourself a lvl 20 that goes afk after dying once or starts running down mid, what does he care he's probably been banned 5 times already and is getting a kick out of it So your point is that they should rather be put with new players and completely ruin the games there? Then the chance for a new player to get a fair game would be almost zero. Just deal with it, there is no fair solution apart from forbidding smurfs altogether what would be basically impossible.
HàrrowR (EUW)
: > [{quoted}](name=Who Fed Ru,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=2uYEQyEh,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2019-07-26T00:14:07.093+0000) > > Level actually doesn't mean anything in that case, if a "level 23" gets paired against plats that's 95% a smurf. Yes a smurf who has a different account cause his other one is banned for flaming or leaving, just now i had a player who said next account, later and left, so what the fk does smurfing have to do with when the smurfs are toxic
> [{quoted}](name=HàrrowR,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=2uYEQyEh,comment-id=00010000,timestamp=2019-07-26T00:29:54.214+0000) > > Yes a smurf who has a different account cause his other one is banned for flaming or leaving, just now i had a player who said next account, later and left, so what the fk does smurfing have to do with when the smurfs are toxic dafuq? That is an entirely different topic. Should level 23 smurfs be put into matches with real low levels and ruin the experience there for actual new players or what? If his MMR is plat level he gets put into plat matches, dunno where the problem there is. I don't rly see your point here and what you are complaining about. You can only play Ranked from level30 onward anyway.
HàrrowR (EUW)
: RIOT this has got to stop, lvl 23 in my team going up against plat and diamonds?
Level actually doesn't mean anything in that case, if a "level 23" gets paired against plats that's 95% a smurf.
Exibir mais

Who Fed Ru

Nível 38 (EUW)
Total de votos positivos
Criar uma discussão