: That would make tanks worse at tanking towers and assassins better, comparatively. Do you really want that?
> [{quoted}](name=goodiesohhi,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=sfmYaoIk,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2019-10-21T07:08:15.466+0000) > > That would make tanks worse at tanking towers and assassins better, comparatively. Do you really want that? Actually, it would prove equal across the board according to % health. So someone who has less health would take similar damage to someone who has more, and vice-versa. It would be equal for everyone.
Comentários de Rioters
Ännïe (NA)
: Latest AVG/Avast Compatibility Issue
Well, you can add an exception to the LoL folder so it is not scanned and therefore it doesn't receive "interop" issues with that product. This may be another way around the issues that AVs are causing with League if no one has tried it yet. The disconnection, if it involves AV, will be interop related. This means that if you exclude the folder or files in question it will not interact with that game and so the disconnect issue wont occur. IIRC, League only has the one folder that runs its files out of. I do not believe it really utilizes "/appdata/" too heavily, so this may be the only folder to exclude. It's better to strictly only exclude a file instead of an entire folder so you do not poke a giant blind spot in your security, but a folder could work as well if it is not simply one or two hashes (i.e., processes/files) involved. This sometimes isn't always the case if it is a deeper interop that occurs due to it happening regardless of the AV sensor being turned off or not. This can be an AV-change on the AV providers end in those cases. Nothing wrong with Defender either; I've used it in the past. However, many use other AVs and that probably won't go away. Most of them you can use Defender alongside the other AV.
Comentários de Rioters
Comentários de Rioters
: opgg is korea only
I see an na.op.gg and it works fine for other regions.
Comentários de Rioters
Kythers (NA)
: I don't trust riot to do this properly, it would likely make it easier for your account to get hacked if they implement this somehow
> [{quoted}](name=Kythers,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=lFFL8jik,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2019-01-04T15:33:45.804+0000) > > I don't trust riot to do this properly, it would likely make it easier for your account to get hacked if they implement this somehow ? That makes zero sense, lol. Not flaming you but this is a proven way of securing an account for multiple companies. You cannot really do this improperly. Unless you're just trolling. :P
Clαps (EUW)
: Yo Riot Disable new champs in ranked for 2 weeks ty
While it frustrates me to see someone playing a champ in a ranked game that they've never used before and want to test it out (a new champ), it is no different than doing the same thing with an old champ that they've never played before. It doesn't address the bigger issue there - it happens to both new and old champs. It doesn't have to be a new release. If you want to do something like this you could go to the other end of it and say you cannot play your champ in Ranked unless you're mastery level 5 or above, and that will never happen. Ultimately, it is their choice. Just like you cannot flame the guy for his build because it isn't meta. I disagree with your thinking here. Win some, you lose some.
Spotty (NA)
: I hope league dies now that china banned it
Looks like we found one of the toxic people to remove from League.
Comentários de Rioters
Comentários de Rioters
: {{champion:45}} IS THAT A SHORT JOKE?
{{champion:85}} Sounds like we're having a little conversation here.
: "The boards are a small minority of the community who just want to complain."
This discussion feels like someone wanting to complain and moan about people complaining and moaning. Not sure this is proving the point you want it to. -Armsman
: Boy do I love...
I actually agree here. While the current chest system is great for those still collecting champs it really lacks rewards for those whom of which have each champ already. Those of us committed to LoL for many years should at least be rewarded with a higher rate of something we don't own over those whom do not own every champion. **Example: **Once owning all champions you will be rewarded with having a 70% higher chance of gaining skin shards over champ shards. Or something like that... I used to be excited about receiving free keys and chests when I log in, now I receive more free keys with this new system but it only leads to champion shards. While it is awesome getting free things (don't get me wrong I do appreciate free things) it really gets boring just being able to cash in the champ shards for a little meager blue essence. **Make Skin Shards Great Again!** -An Overly Concerned Skinless LoL Citizen
: Champion Reveal: Illaoi, the Kraken Priestess
Cool character but i feel the ultimate is a little weak looking as far as variety goes. At least let Illaoi summon the entire Kraken to pull the character under or something out of the ordinary than just summoning more tentacles. I feel creativity took a backseat on this ultimate ingenuity. But kudos for an interesting champion and hopefully an even more competitive gameplay.
: I have had the same problem and tried the same things. I just emailed support and haven't gotten a response yet. Anyone gotten any sort of response from RIOT yet?
Mine just started working. Hopefully tonight will be different. :)
Comentários de Rioters
Kiwi Ink (NA)
: Poppy's skins are nearly all limited edition or legacy, but all in all she has 7 skins.
Ah, you're right! I forgot about those (blacksmith poppy, lollipoppy, etc.). I guess I wish she had more that were regular skins and not LE or LEG. Thank you for the clarification though.
: She has a lot of skins it's a re-work and VU that would make her loved again.
Odd, I only see three when others have like 5-7.
Comentários de Rioters


Nível 167 (NA)
Total de votos positivos
Criar uma discussão