: But it would be abused. People would try to pressure others into leaving the game when things are looking bad. Loss prevented also adds Lp to the league, which could result in inflation of ranks.
> [{quoted}](name=Cind3rkick,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=UpdTyLt3,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2020-01-24T08:50:07.380+0000) > > But it would be abused. > > People would try to pressure others into leaving the game when things are looking bad. Loss prevented also adds Lp to the league, which could result in inflation of ranks. Mute exists. People tell people to leave already if you actually leave cause someone tells you to you are at fault. Plus the person telling you to leave then has to hold out for 10 more minutes. No it just doesn't remove lp. There's also the option of simply nullifying the game and making it so that the winners get compensated with say 100 orange essence and the losers 50 blue essence. Making the entire thing a normal match.
Comentários de Rioters
Comentários de Rioters
Kei143 (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=AngryCanadianEH,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=RpyEtJOP,comment-id=,timestamp=2020-01-21T03:04:35.541+0000) > > How many times has this happened to you? > > Sorry for the long into but this kinda thing happens way too often in league. I took notes on my s8 ventures and saw 3 inters in 250 games, this is across all game modes. My gaming experience hasn't changed much since s8. So ... maybe you are just .. exaggerating? Or maybe you have a poor definition of what an inter is? Also, the tribunal didn't give any power to the players. It just gave the players a FEELING that they had power. After a player reaches a certain number of punishment votes, a Rioter will come in and verify the punishment. Ultimately, they had the final say on who got punished.
> [{quoted}](name=Kei143,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=RpyEtJOP,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2020-01-21T03:14:07.147+0000) > > I took notes on my s8 ventures and saw 3 inters in 250 games, this is across all game modes. > > My gaming experience hasn't changed much since s8. > > So ... maybe you are just .. exaggerating? Or maybe you have a poor definition of what an inter is? > > Also, the tribunal didn't give any power to the players. It just gave the players a FEELING that they had power. After a player reaches a certain number of punishment votes, a Rioter will come in and verify the punishment. Ultimately, they had the final say on who got punished. Or maybe youre experiences arent everyones so what you experience personally isnt an indicator of anything.
: Elder Immolation is a stupid mechanic
no just get rid of it and give a percent current hp burn with adaptive damage that is applied on aas or skills and bonus damage to minions.
Comentários de Rioters
Comentários de Rioters
Comentários de Rioters
Prandine (NA)
: Constructive criticism is perfectly fine, and there are plenty of posts that criticize Riot that are left up, such as the ones against the removal of both Dominion and Twisted Treeline for example. That said, there's a difference between constructive and destructive criticism. For example, stuff like "Senna currently feels very unfair to play against due to her high amount of damage and short cooldowns, leaving little room or time to react. I think nerfing her cooldowns and/or damage will provide more counterplay opportunities against her and feel fairer to face" is fine, but stuff like "OMG Stupid Riot, Senna is broken, nerf her damage now you morons" is not fine. One is voicing concern about Senna's damage while also providing a possible solution to the issue, while the other is just ranting about her damage and insulting Riot without providing any reasons as to why her damage is broken or any possible solutions to fix it. The former is allowed while the latter isn't. From the [Universal Rules](https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/community-moderation/ITFIpNUE): >**Disrespecting or Insulting Other Community Members** Do not post content intended to insult, belittle, disrespect, or intentionally offend other community members as individuals or as groups. **Criticism is an important and useful method of feedback, but must be respectful and constructive in nature. Non-constructive forms of criticism (such as questioning another poster's intelligence or requesting the firing or removal of an individual) are violations of this rule.** Emphasis mine. Also, this isn't something exclusive to the LoL boards, as many places have rules against overly negative and dismissive (for lack of a better word) posts. Basically if your form of criticism is just to flame, harass and name-call (basically being uncivilized) then it's not allowed.
> [{quoted}](name=Prandine,realm=NA,application-id=GgNYATV4,discussion-id=19JjTiXA,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2019-12-09T05:44:47.180+0000) > > Constructive criticism is perfectly fine, and there are plenty of posts that criticize Riot that are left up, such as the ones against the removal of both Dominion and Twisted Treeline for example. That said, there's a difference between constructive and destructive criticism. For example, stuff like "Senna currently feels very unfair to play against due to her high amount of damage and short cooldowns, leaving little room or time to react. I think nerfing her cooldowns and/or damage will provide more counterplay opportunities against her and feel fairer to face" is fine, but stuff like "OMG Stupid Riot, Senna is broken, nerf her damage now you morons" is not fine. > > One is voicing concern about Senna's damage while also providing a possible solution to the issue, while the other is just ranting about her damage and insulting Riot without providing any reasons as to why her damage is broken or any possible solutions to fix it. The former is allowed while the latter isn't. From the [Universal Rules](https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/community-moderation/ITFIpNUE): > Do not post content intended to insult, belittle, disrespect, or intentionally offend other community members as individuals or as groups. **Criticism is an important and useful method of feedback, but must be respectful and constructive in nature. Non-constructive forms of criticism (such as questioning another poster's intelligence or requesting the firing or removal of an individual) are violations of this rule.** > > Emphasis mine. Also, this isn't something exclusive to the LoL boards, as many places have rules against overly negative and dismissive (for lack of a better word) posts. Basically if your form of criticism is just to flame, harass and name-call (basically being uncivilized) then it's not allowed. youre either misinformed or a liar. I made a post talking about howe pathing and minion ai and skill hitboxes are broken didnt insult just pointed to the flaws and what they are and was deleted from gameplay.
: Lux is cancer, she has no downsides from missing her abilties, this makes her easy to play, hard to punish as all 3 abilties can be used defensively , seriously 2 different ranged CC? I just switched on Pokimane for some THICC and Ive seen her play support in twitch rivals. when she chose mid I was surprised, and I was like let me guess LUX right? YEP Lux. She's not a very good lux, she wasted her flash 3 times, sometimes doesn't come close to lander her W or Q. Guess what Pokimane's rank is D3. Imagine a good player with Lux OMG... Also a Lux main wrote how even though she is a Lux main she noticed Lux has been slowly getting buffed almost every season for no reason and its gotten pretty bad at this point when it all adds up.
> [{quoted}](name=D3GEN3R4TE,realm=NA,application-id=GgNYATV4,discussion-id=XEr04VI1,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2019-12-07T11:00:20.150+0000) > > Lux is cancer, she has no downsides from missing her abilties, this makes her easy to play, hard to punish as all 3 abilties can be used defensively , seriously 2 different ranged CC? I just switched on Pokimane for some THICC and Ive seen her play support in twitch rivals. when she chose mid I was surprised, and I was like let me guess LUX right? YEP Lux. She's not a very good lux, she wasted her flash 3 times, sometimes doesn't come close to lander her W or Q. > > Guess what Pokimane's rank is D3. Imagine a good player with Lux OMG... > > Also a Lux main wrote how even though she is a Lux main she noticed Lux has been slowly getting buffed almost every season for no reason and its gotten pretty bad at this point when it all adds up. immagine ultimate hunter extra 5percent cdr with 4 cloud drakes. Yw for the nightmares.
: i know 100% i'm going to lose when any of my team mates pick any of the following champs
You cxlearly havent seen me teemo. I LOVE getting 4 second shrooms with 4 cloud dragons. I HAVE GONE BEYOND MERE TEEMO AND BECOME SHROOMO
: Thats literally any board run by anything lmao.
> [{quoted}](name=Todoroki Shoto,realm=NA,application-id=GgNYATV4,discussion-id=Km9WvUrV,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-12-10T05:58:06.047+0000) > > Thats literally any board run by anything lmao. if its a horrifyingly bad one run by idiots sure.
: I get this. My biggest annoyance is someone was calling me offense racial slurs and other profound words. And all i said to them is "you're an idiot please uninstall" 1 single line got me muted in chat and i lost my honor level 5. Do you know how much time it takes to get there. I went from 5 to 1 off of one sentence and this person had no penalties not a ban for being raciest nothing. I repprted him and everything. Apparently riot's line is "uninstall" once you tell someone not to play their game. It is an instant ban. Atleast lower the honor level punishment. come on 5 straight to 1? I lost all the honor rewards for that.
> [{quoted}](name=xXAbblesauceXx,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=Nj1Ekb1E,comment-id=0024,timestamp=2019-12-08T23:55:29.510+0000) > > I get this. My biggest annoyance is someone was calling me offense racial slurs and other profound words. And all i said to them is "you're an idiot please uninstall" 1 single line got me muted in chat and i lost my honor level 5. Do you know how much time it takes to get there. I went from 5 to 1 off of one sentence and this person had no penalties not a ban for being raciest nothing. I repprted him and everything. Apparently riot's line is "uninstall" once you tell someone not to play their game. It is an instant ban. Atleast lower the honor level punishment. come on 5 straight to 1? I lost all the honor rewards for that. Yop no matter how good a person you are and slight your offense is, commit one 4 times and lose you account. Riot only cares about the perception that their game is toxic and the easiest way to curb it? ban people who type over act. Oh and if you go to the player behavior thread they will say oh well you would go to jail if you killed someone! they equate sarcasm to murder in this game. Because riot and the like are run by sjws. People who pretend to be virtuous but are the biggest contributors to bigotry.
Comentários de Rioters
Keyru (NA)
: Boards Moderation Discord Verification
: > [{quoted}](name=Tomoe Gozen,realm=EUNE,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=IN0u2OsR,comment-id=0000000000010003,timestamp=2019-12-05T12:47:12.424+0000) > > Ah yes, how can i be so dumb? > Of course! One instance where Blizz "balances" their game makes them many times better than Riot. Not to mention the whole elitist shits who don't let "dead" classes to raid. Or after a single wipe, they immediately disband the party, forcing everyone to wait for another 30 years to queue up instead of working to a better strategy. > > One look at Blizz's own forums and you'll see there's plethora of complaints about WoW, just like there is for League. You're comparing apples and oranges here. WoW has its own set of issues and the difference between these games is that Riot's patch cadence is every two weeks while for WoW, months (which is typical for MMOs). So once a broken item/class appears, it takes months before Blizzard does something, even if its destroying PvP. Blizzard has issues, but blizzard has done very well listening to its players feed back, and making changes based on that feed back and most of the feed back was from people on the forms. Riot has a very very low track record of taking feed back from the forms. I know I can name more post's on the blizzard forms that were taken, and put into the game compared to Riot. How many post on Riot forms have been taken, and put into the game? I honestly can't even think of one. And I am sure there is one from years and years ago, but that's it. Its pretty simple when it comes to comparing the two.
thats because your thread has to gain viral support or riot flat out ignores it. there is no way to submit suggestions even via ticket because the people employed in that area do not have the ability to pass that on. This is coming from a rioter.
Comentários de Rioters
: If Riot were to give loss forgiven to one side, they would need to diminish the LP gained for the winning side to avoid stacking imbalances in LP gain/loss. And that wouldn't feel nice for the winning team to be only offered a pittance because someone on the other team left when they were getting steamrolled. Greatly increasing the punishment for leaving is not going to increase the quality of your games that would have had a leave. If a person disconnected unintentionally, they'd still have disconnected no matter how harsh you make the penalty. If a person disconnects intentionally, knowing that disconnecting holds an extremely harsh penalty for leaving, they'd just stick around and intentionally play like shit to end the game faster. If they were willing to get a guaranteed loss by leaving they wouldn't be that adverse to playing poorly intentionally to end the game early with a loss. As long as they made it remotely look like they were playing like shit unintentionally they would avoid even manual reviews.
> [{quoted}](name=AeroWaffle,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=7TL7YsEP,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-12-06T07:19:39.912+0000) > > If Riot were to give loss forgiven to one side, they would need to diminish the LP gained for the winning side to avoid stacking imbalances in LP gain/loss. And that wouldn't feel nice for the winning team to be only offered a pittance because someone on the other team left when they were getting steamrolled. > > Greatly increasing the punishment for leaving is not going to increase the quality of your games that would have had a leave. > > If a person disconnected unintentionally, they'd still have disconnected no matter how harsh you make the penalty. > > If a person disconnects intentionally, knowing that disconnecting holds an extremely harsh penalty for leaving, they'd just stick around and intentionally play like shit to end the game faster. If they were willing to get a guaranteed loss by leaving they wouldn't be that adverse to playing poorly intentionally to end the game early with a loss. As long as they made it remotely look like they were playing like shit unintentionally they would avoid even manual reviews. The winning team getting anything for an unfair advantage is already more than they deserve. Ranked is supposed to be a competition of skill. You are not proving anything when you win 5 v 4. Besides the winning team already got a reward in the free win they where presented with further consideration of their feelings when the LOSING TEAM had zero possible way to win is not relevant and is actively punished for it is ridiculous. I don't care if the person rage quit cause they where feeding. A meat shield is a meat shield. I can sometimes carry feeders. I cant carry afks. So deterring them from leaving is already a massive quality improvement. This is true and unfortunate but the majority of leavers are not dcing. Maybe but theye'd still be a meat shield. Also this just means the next task would be implementing systems to detect this. You always have a higher chance to win with 5 than 4 and an intentionally crap player is still not really different than an unintentionally bad player.
Comentários de Rioters
Comentários de Rioters
: LMAO a garen main, I guessed it from just reading your high iq comment.
He was clearly being sarcastic. If you wanna call out someone else's IQ maybe make sure yours is up to par.
Comentários de Rioters
terrhy (NA)
: Why do support items still have diminishing gold when fully completed?
Because riot has more skin makers and champ designers than bug fixers and balance people. Didn't you know they employ ONE person on the balance team? Why do you think they cant ever fix any bugs. It doesn't generate money to fix broken shit.
Comentários de Rioters
: I think its because u can only buy a certain amount a day so prob capped at like 3 ? (usually items have a certain amount capped), and also 1 day out of the year, the bundle is reduced by 50% (unless we dont have this anymore??? I dont care about runepages, i only use 1 rune page)
> [{quoted}](name=Pumpedhero,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=VqKB8y30,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-11-28T18:47:34.091+0000) > > I think its because u can only buy a certain amount a day so prob capped at like 3 ? (usually items have a certain amount capped), and also 1 day out of the year, the bundle is reduced by 50% (unless we dont have this anymore??? I dont care about runepages, i only use 1 rune page) i jsut bought 5
Comentários de Rioters
: > [{quoted}](name=D357R0Y3R,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=K3w7NsKi,comment-id=,timestamp=2019-11-27T23:30:00.511+0000) > > but why did you make it so they take a longer time to get free wards So pro mids have an easier time ganking the bot lane that is 2 levels below them.
Comentários de Rioters

Qiyana Ixaocan

Nível 58 (NA)
Total de votos positivos
Criar uma discussão