Comentários de Rioters
: The crazy thing is, LeBlanc is (probably) even older than him. {{sticker:slayer-jinx-wink}}
> [{quoted}](name=Interlocutioner,realm=NA,application-id=6kFXY1kR,discussion-id=zVdpde1w,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2018-01-19T20:29:45.932+0000) > > The crazy thing is, LeBlanc is (probably) even older than him. {{sticker:slayer-jinx-wink}} WHAT. LOVELY ELDERLY COUPLE SWAIN x LEBLANC I AM TOTALLY 100% OKAY WITH THIS.
: I want to see what would happen if CertainlyT designed a CertainlyT meme.
> [{quoted}](name=Interlocutioner,realm=NA,application-id=Ir7ZrJjF,discussion-id=1gLV6khz,comment-id=000a,timestamp=2018-01-11T18:07:17.024+0000) > > I want to see what would happen if CertainlyT designed a CertainlyT meme. Hey, sorry for asking such off topic things, but do you happen to know the reason behind taking down the Sion Promo page? It's been inaccessabe for a while. And... well... there's a theory that it has something to do with a certain VGU... {{champion:50}}
Novalas (NA)
: no he's a bird.
> [{quoted}](name=Riot Novalas,realm=NA,application-id=A7LBtoKc,discussion-id=wRUXAmkK,comment-id=0000000000010000,timestamp=2018-01-10T20:58:14.616+0000) > > no he's a bird. Hmm... sounds like a certain upcoming VGU {{champion:50}}
Reav3 (NA)
: Just want to remind the boards that SpiderAxe is not a rioter and doesn't actually know when and if Swain will have a teaser. He is just purely speculating and his theories don't constitute a actual teaser.
> [{quoted}](name=Reav3,realm=NA,application-id=6kFXY1kR,discussion-id=2xeytT1A,comment-id=0003,timestamp=2018-01-08T17:31:28.516+0000) > > Just want to remind the boards that SpiderAxe is not a rioter and doesn't actually know when and if Swain will have a teaser. He is just purely speculating and his theories don't constitute a actual teaser. Um... "IF he will have a teaser"?? Please don't joke like this mr. Reav3... {{sticker:sg-janna}}
: Riot doesn't do "ugly" characters anymore. :( Making an "ugly" character requires much more creativity than making a "pretty" one. But, judging by the upvotes, Riot knows it's what their playerbase wants. Riot is now fully aiming at a preteen audience and preteens usually like cute anime characters.
A fearsome old man = cute anime character? Well... okay...
Comentários de Rioters
: > [{quoted}](name=SpyroTF,realm=NA,application-id=6kFXY1kR,discussion-id=8z86b5ZE,comment-id=001300000000,timestamp=2017-12-27T12:49:03.032+0000) > > Ok, so being a lore/Swain junkie that I am, I just HAVE to ask a few questions about this. > 1. This reflects Swain's new lore, right? Seeing as Urgot is listed as his enemy, which was not the case in the old lore. > 2. I can't seem to find Vlad... he is still a part of the Black Rose, isn't he? Shouldn't he be linked at least to some of their other members? So I was going off this segment of Urgot's new bio: > Even so, a single word was all it took to seal his fate. Sent to distant Zaun to eliminate a supposed conspiracy against the ruler of Noxus, Urgot realized too late the mission was a setup, removing him from the capital even as the usurper Swain seized control of it. Which I took to be entirely reasonable evidence for Urgot having a particular hate frenzy for Swain. As for Vlad, he, like Sona, hasn't been visited by the new-lore-fairy yet, but as none of the other new lores mention him in a way I could reference, he sits in the collection of singletons at the bottom in a box. Sona would have been there too, were it not for Quinn's new lore obliquely referencing someone who I assume will still be related to her. I assume he's still an important member of the Black Rose too, but I have no player-facing evidence to support it yet - so I didn't add it.
I see, thanks! Hoping to see the chart updated when the Swain rework comes out, I've got a feeling it will reveal quite a lot.
: > [{quoted}](name=Ebonmaw Dragon,realm=NA,application-id=6kFXY1kR,discussion-id=8z86b5ZE,comment-id=0013,timestamp=2017-12-26T18:40:05.533+0000) > > Now that some questions have been aswered... I would like to ask if the Bot also considers the things from Alternative Universes that are in the Universe page (Star Guardians and Proyect) or not? > > I guess that it doesnt... and that is good because it would be a problem if it mix info from AU with the canon lore I imagine what the bot is doing is crawling the [Champions page](https://universe.leagueoflegends.com/en_GB/champions/), opening every champion page listed, and then searching for the contents of the Related Champ container. So Star Guardian information wouldn't be listed there, and the information gathered hasn't been hand-edited for accuracy or old/new lore beliefs. If it's on Universe, it's supposed to be in Necrozard's graph. (I know you're not asking about that side of it, but many people seem to be taking issue with Necrozard specifically, when they are simply the messenger.) If there are issues with the data, then it's on Riot to fix it - not Necrozard :D {{sticker:sg-ahri-2}} This is why, when I made my graph, I started hand-editing the data because so much of the official, Universe, data felt superfluous, or old, or missing. Problem is, that's a mad rabbit-hole of opinion, headcanon, old/new lore, and interpretation. For example, in _my graph_, I had a relationship from Quinn --> Sona because it was a Buvelle matriarch (Lestara herself) who was saved from a frenzied beast, and who spoke on behalf of Quinn when she was entering the Demacian military. That's not listed on Universe, and indeed, it's possible that Quinn and Sona have never met - we have no updated info on Sona yet or her relationship to Lestara Buvelle, or how noteworthy a particularly headstrong scout with her Azurite Eagle might be. So me including it is headcanon. Rioters have headcanon too :) But also on _my graph_, I do not include the Universe-approved connections of Sona -> Taric, Sona -> Xin Zhao, or Sona -> Ryze, because there's no updated, player-facing, information to support any of those. Makes Sona a very lonely node, but that's to be expected I suppose without her new biography. Remember, my graph was just something I put together as a personal thing. I'm sure everyone else's would be different. Here's a screenshot (grainy, sorry): https://imgur.com/a/Xs5ck That's just one champion (my main) in a network of all champs. Going through every possible connection and being able to decide whether it is or is not something to be included in a graph is a minefield - and I totally understand why Necrozard wouldn't put him/her-self through that. There's no winning there. {{sticker:sona-playing}} I think this is where people take personal offense to my graph? Let's do this :)
Ok, so being a lore/Swain junkie that I am, I just HAVE to ask a few questions about this. 1. This reflects Swain's new lore, right? Seeing as Urgot is listed as his enemy, which was not the case in the old lore. 2. I can't seem to find Vlad... he is still a part of the Black Rose, isn't he? Shouldn't he be linked at least to some of their other members?
: Please keep Du Couteau cannon
[They are still canon.](https://imgur.com/a/BagYQ) From https://ask.fm/RiotJaredan
iLBGAMing (EUW)
: Question for Aatrox players/mains
That was the reason why I started playing him in the first place. I especially appreciate the elegance in his overall silhouette and face, it really supports his idea that violence = elegance.
Comentários de Rioters

SpyroTF

Nível 8 (NA)
Total de votos positivos
Criar uma discussão