: Why does the launcher now have a launcher?
Ah. It seems to be because Riot has finally made another game and they thus needed to make the account system seperate from league specifically. Too bad its a hearthstone ripoff that's undoubtedly going to be just as if not more pay to win...
Comentários de Rioters
: Yeah, it really does have it’s issues. It’s really good for editing, whether it be photoshop or film edits, and business based tasks, but gaming is definitely not a strong point for Mac. Unfortunate since I really dislike PCs...but now I am honestly debating on getting a PC just for gaming to relieve the stress and problems off my Mac, at least until I can afford a newer model. :/
> [{quoted}](name=secondtononeee,realm=NA,application-id=LqLKtMpN,discussion-id=kPqoay6A,comment-id=00010000,timestamp=2019-10-15T13:06:56.987+0000) > > Yeah, it really does have it’s issues. It’s really good for editing, whether it be photoshop or film edits, and business based tasks, but gaming is definitely not a strong point for Mac. Unfortunate since I really dislike PCs...but now I am honestly debating on getting a PC just for gaming to relieve the stress and problems off my Mac, at least until I can afford a newer model. :/ Oh no, I wasn't speaking of macs in general, just the recent major OSX update. Macs use the same hardware as PCs these days, so when games are actually written for them, they (should) work fine. It's just that not that man people support them because you can dual boot and run it in windows.
Zac x Me (NA)
: Well you must have installed something that causes this. My Ryzen 7 1700X and RX 580 have no problem maintaining 75Hz at WQHD at all times. If I turn the FPS limit off, the FPS ranges between 200 - 130 FPS in a match.
> [{quoted}](name=Zac x Me,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=0YoplLl3,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2019-10-14T04:51:33.348+0000) > > Well you must have installed something that causes this. > > My Ryzen 7 1700X and RX 580 have no problem maintaining 75Hz at WQHD at all times. If I turn the FPS limit off, the FPS ranges between 200 - 130 FPS in a match. same CPU, perfect fps on my 144Hz monitor at all times.
: Mac Unable to locate Start Up Disk after League Crashes
I don't use a Mac, but i've been reading that the newest macOS release has been pretty riddled with issues, more so than the average one. Given the compatibility issues it has with some major game titles, that could also be an issue as well.
: Mac Unable to locate Start Up Disk after League Crashes
If stuff's crashing that often it could be something more serious, the ram might be bad or something on the mother board is going bad.
: Client crashes during champ select, returned to it but cant pick due to Loading screen
yeah i love taking hits to my LP when i had no intention of dodging but riot's client wouldn't let me pick. And support flat out says they will never adjust LP, even if it was caused by their software malfunctioning. Fun. I mean whats the point in reconnecting me to champ select when there's no way I'll be able to pick?
: Garen has currently a 55.92 win rate mid and a 55.50% win rate top
It probably isn't acceptable, but they can't just instantly conjure up changes to address it, it takes time.
: [BUG] Invincible 100% Loading Screen in ALL Game Modes (5v5, TFT, etc.)
what's keeping you from opening task manager? I've never been prevented from doing this.
Haunce (NA)
: I fully accept that I displayed a pattern of behavior and refused to learn from it before it was too late. I fully disagree with the pattern that they recognized as I believe I was having discussions in game and just as I'm capable of muting people, others are capable of muting me. If two people opt to launch into an argument then that's on both parties. I play at the best of my ability regardless and na.op.gg shows me as being in the top 11% of the playerbase. The behavior they recognized was not something I believe to be toxic, and that's where I messed up. Up until yesterday, I never though to ask for highlighted chat logs to show what exactly is toxic. I assumed it was based on key words and that riot simply didn't approve of me calling people "apes" or "monsters" or other, more hurtful words. I didn't realize the issue was me trying to tell people they're wrong for saying the things they said. I thought the issue was how I was saying it. And I was wrong. I also believe it's wrong that the system sees this and detects it as being worthy of even a 10-game chat restriction, honestly.
> [{quoted}](name=Haunce,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=hWZP9Qs2,comment-id=000200000000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-10-15T01:11:32.671+0000) > > I fully accept that I displayed a pattern of behavior and refused to learn from it before it was too late. > I fully disagree with the pattern that they recognized as I believe I was having discussions in game and just as I'm capable of muting people, others are capable of muting me. If two people opt to launch into an argument then that's on both parties. I play at the best of my ability regardless and na.op.gg shows me as being in the top 11% of the playerbase. > The behavior they recognized was not something I believe to be toxic, and that's where I messed up. Up until yesterday, I never though to ask for highlighted chat logs to show what exactly is toxic. I assumed it was based on key words and that riot simply didn't approve of me calling people "apes" or "monsters" or other, more hurtful words. I didn't realize the issue was me trying to tell people they're wrong for saying the things they said. I thought the issue was how I was saying it. And I was wrong. > I also believe it's wrong that the system sees this and detects it as being worthy of even a 10-game chat restriction, honestly. again, its simply the result of punishments being cumulative. I agree that all things considered, your mistake was on the smaller side. But as far as the rules are concerned, any mistake is still a mistake.
Haunce (NA)
: I fully agree that I had a negative attitude in this game. It was not my first one, and as I said I used to say hurtful things in situations like this. I improved. The system didn't recognize that I'm no longer toxic. Sivir reported me because obviously. The enemy team reported me because I typed in all chat and nobody likes when you do that and that was my bad but I wasn't toxic. I was negative. I don't think this game should have been the final straw.
> [{quoted}](name=Haunce,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=hWZP9Qs2,comment-id=00020001000000010000,timestamp=2019-10-15T00:40:47.343+0000) > > I fully agree that I had a negative attitude in this game. > It was not my first one, and as I said I used to say hurtful things in situations like this. I improved. The system didn't recognize that I'm no longer toxic. Sivir reported me because obviously. The enemy team reported me because I typed in all chat and nobody likes when you do that and that was my bad but I wasn't toxic. I was negative. > I don't think this game should have been the final straw. I will grant you that this is a comparatively minor incident vs. a lot of w hat i see come up in this forum. That being said though, Riot basically gives you a certain number of strikes and then you're done. More severe mistakes effectively give more than one strike, but every punishment is at least one, and once you use them up, you're done. On the FFXIV forum, my "final straw" was calling an idea the R word. A bad decision in retrospect, I targeted the idea and not the person themselves, so at the time it seemed minor to me, but judge&jury disagreed. That being said, it wasn't my first mistake, so I got the ban.
Haunce (NA)
: I understand you. This makes sense why the algorithm would take length into consideration. Though I do think the pattern based analysis has many flaws and that returning to a player-based, context-involved punishment system is the better option.
> [{quoted}](name=Haunce,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=hWZP9Qs2,comment-id=00000000000000010000,timestamp=2019-10-15T01:07:29.958+0000) > > I understand you. > This makes sense why the algorithm would take length into consideration. > > Though I do think the pattern based analysis has many flaws and that returning to a player-based, context-involved punishment system is the better option. I don't think anyone thinks its perfect, but that's why cases can be reviewd. There are extaordinary circumstances where the system may miss the mark, but their systems have been developed over years based on tons of data and analysis of player behavior. You may not know this, but riot has psychologists on its staff who study and analyze player behavior with the specific goal of finding any systemic way they can reduce it. If these guys write peer reviewed papers on the subject you may well end up seeing analyses of toxic in game rants in modern psychology textbooks.
Haunce (NA)
: Having someone tell me that I'm wrong and deserve to be punished, using the exact same methods I use when I play the game is painful. I am not deflecting, as you have seen in my other posts. I accept that Riot decided I was wrong. Morally, I don't believe that. "fester - (of a negative feeling or a problem) become worse or more intense, especially through long-term neglect or indifference." I chose this word for this definition.
> [{quoted}](name=Haunce,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=hWZP9Qs2,comment-id=0001000200010000,timestamp=2019-10-15T00:59:12.010+0000) > > Having someone tell me that I'm wrong and deserve to be punished, using the exact same methods I use when I play the game is painful. > I am not deflecting, as you have seen in my other posts. I accept that Riot decided I was wrong. Morally, I don't believe that. > > "fester - (of a negative feeling or a problem) become worse or more intense, especially through long-term neglect or indifference." > > I chose this word for this definition. Festering isn't something you do, it's something that happens. Fostering is something you do, and it can be either positive or negative. It would have been a more correct word choice. I can't fester something. Festering (generally) is a result of an unattended or untreated problem. Fostering is causing an environment to change in some way. Festering is a change that occurs on its own.
Haunce (NA)
: That's fair when you get home feel free to look at the image. The examples you provided in no way represent anything that I said in the chat log. I didn't insult anyone's game play (except regrettably yuumi but it was not intended that way. I was arguing on his behalf)\ When I stated that yuumi is bronze 1, it's because the sivir was flaming him. I used na.op.gg to look up the yuumi player and discovered that he was, in fact, bronze 1. I was not saying "yuumi is bronze 1" as an insult, but I was saying "yuumi is bronze 1" as a way to inform sivir that of course he's not going to make any impressive plays. Which is OKAY.
> [{quoted}](name=Haunce,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=hWZP9Qs2,comment-id=0001000200000000,timestamp=2019-10-15T00:27:26.628+0000) > > That's fair when you get home feel free to look at the image. > > The examples you provided in no way represent anything that I said in the chat log. > I didn't insult anyone's game play (except regrettably yuumi but it was not intended that way. I was arguing on his behalf)\ > When I stated that yuumi is bronze 1, it's because the sivir was flaming him. > I used na.op.gg to look up the yuumi player and discovered that he was, in fact, bronze 1. > I was not saying "yuumi is bronze 1" as an insult, but I was saying "yuumi is bronze 1" as a way to inform sivir that of course he's not going to make any impressive plays. Which is OKAY. It wasn't supposed to exactly represent what you did in the chat log, it was provided to give you an idea of the difference between having a disagreement and being a jerk about it.
Haunce (NA)
: The system indicates that I was reported 5 times over a period of 20 games. It does not state that I was reported in 5 of the 20 games I played. "Players have reported you 5 times in the past 20 games for negative or abusive behaviors in chat" is the exact wording. I can eat 50 bagels in 10 meals. It doesn't mean I had 5 bagels every meal.
> [{quoted}](name=Haunce,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=hWZP9Qs2,comment-id=000100010000000000000000,timestamp=2019-10-15T01:02:35.557+0000) > > The system indicates that I was reported 5 times over a period of 20 games. > It does not state that I was reported in 5 of the 20 games I played. > "Players have reported you 5 times in the past 20 games for negative or abusive behaviors in chat" is the exact wording. Well if you want to mince words, it was probably at least 2 games, as you're unlikely to be reported by everyone in a game unless you're actually toxic towards everybody. Most people, even those who let a few bad words slip, don't get that kind of a ratio of reports to games played.
Haunce (NA)
: I just wish Riot could give me one final opportunity to have my account back, but I know that's not possible. If nothing else it would be of benefit to other players like me, who struggle with their morality in allowing people to hate on others, for Riot to implement a more contextual punishment system again, or to take more drastic measure to prevent people who I think are innocent from being punished. The "prevent send" feature I'm suggesting isn't something I'd genuinely like to see in the game, but if they truly do want to create a "safe place" for all summoners than I believe this would be the most conducive way to do it without resulting in bans that I honestly think aren't worthy of permabans.
> [{quoted}](name=Haunce,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=hWZP9Qs2,comment-id=0002000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-10-15T00:56:16.735+0000) > > I just wish Riot could give me one final opportunity to have my account back, but I know that's not possible. > If nothing else it would be of benefit to other players like me, who struggle with their morality in allowing people to hate on others, for Riot to implement a more contextual punishment system again, or to take more drastic measure to prevent people who I think are innocent from being punished. > > The "prevent send" feature I'm suggesting isn't something I'd genuinely like to see in the game, but if they truly do want to create a "safe place" for all summoners than I believe this would be the most conducive way to do it without resulting in bans that I honestly think aren't worthy of permabans. Sometimes we have to learn things the hard way. Fun Fact, I'm permabanned from the Final Fantasy XIV official forums. (not the game, just the forum). I've learned from the situation, and i'm even a good little boy on the FFXI forum bu t they still won't reverse the ban even years later. But this did have the result of me generally being a lot more careful in chat and dicussion environments. Also, to be clear: You didn't get permabanned specifically because of this incident. You got a permaban because you've received punishments before, and all punishments are cumulative. While I generally don't approve of permanent bans, it did take some effort on your part to get to this point (nothing personal.) so you have to realize that wasn't just one mistake that led to this.
Haunce (NA)
: I agree that I wasn't in the right for taking a stance against how sivir was acting and that, just as in schools where bullying is an issue, the right answer isn't to stand up to your bullies, but rather to allow them to attack you and simply tell a teacher afterwards. In hindsight, I wish I never reenabled the chat function. After receiving my 2 week ban and the warning that I would be perma-banned for my next offence, I tried to be extremely careful. I can do nothing now but wallow in regret for taking a stance in the heat of the moment after not learning that typing in this game gets you banned. Period.
> [{quoted}](name=Haunce,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=hWZP9Qs2,comment-id=000300000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-10-15T00:51:48.946+0000) > > I agree that I wasn't in the right for taking a stance against how sivir was acting and that, just as in schools where bullying is an issue, the right answer isn't to stand up to your bullies, but rather to allow them to attack you and simply tell a teacher afterwards. > I understand the sentiment- but standing up for yourself should only go so far. If someone bullise you and then you punch them out, you're still going to get in trouble for punching someone. But if you "told the teacher" then they get in trouble and you don't. While people should stand up for what is right, that doesn't mean resorting to vigilantism. So I would be really careful about comparing this to bullying. It's not "tattling" or "snitching" if they legitimately did something wrong and you tell the proper authorities about it. I really don't understand why people are being cultured to believe they should solve all problems themselves rather than ask for and/or accept help from others. There is no shame in it. That said, I'm glad you realized your mistake, even if it was too late for this. The game gives you tools to avoid putting yourself in bad situations, it's nobody's fault but the player's if they don't use those tools and take things into their own hands instead.
Haunce (NA)
: It doesn't indicate a 25% report rate. 20x9=180 opportunities to report. 5/180=.028=2.8% report rate.
> [{quoted}](name=Haunce,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=hWZP9Qs2,comment-id=0001000100000000,timestamp=2019-10-15T00:45:18.806+0000) > > It doesn't indicate a 25% report rate. > 20x9=180 opportunities to report. > 5/180=.028=2.8% report rate. Your math is flawed. The system indicates you were reported in 5 out of 20 games. That's a 25% report rate. for the purposes of what the bot is telling you, you were reported in 25% of games- it's not saying you were reported by 25% of players. You don't have to be reported by every player or even multiple players, to have done something toxic. And being reported by more than one player doesn't mean you did something worse than if only one person reported you. It's a binary were you reported or not. You're arguing over semantics and technicality. Contrary to popular belief, technically correct isn't the best kind of correct.
Haunce (NA)
: So the system punishes you based on word count?
> [{quoted}](name=Haunce,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=hWZP9Qs2,comment-id=000000000000,timestamp=2019-10-15T00:38:22.890+0000) > > So the system punishes you based on word count? Length can be a factor because a little barb-trading and taunting the enemy team and stuff is considered within the bounds of acceptableness. But if a conflict develops and drags out, it's a pretty strong sign of toxic behavior from a pattern-analysis standpoint. (Also, the more time you spend typing is less time you spend playing and contributing to the game, so it's also a reasonable factor from that angle as well)
Haunce (NA)
: The behavior I displayed in the games I was suspended for were remarkably similar to how this conversation is unfolding. If the discussion we're currently having is punishable in your mind, then I think we just differ immensely on what "toxic" behavior is.
> [{quoted}](name=Haunce,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=hWZP9Qs2,comment-id=00020000000000000000,timestamp=2019-10-15T00:33:11.792+0000) > > The behavior I displayed in the games I was suspended for were remarkably similar to how this conversation is unfolding. If the discussion we're currently having is punishable in your mind, then I think we just differ immensely on what "toxic" behavior is. Perhaps we do, but I don't think it would be hard for anyone to agree that you at minimum displayed a negative attitude toward another player. Remember that another player having a bad attitude or being toxic does not give you a license to do the same to them. There is no "context" in which reacting to a toxic player with toxicity is okay. I'm genuinely sorry you made a mistake and got punished for it, but hopefully this is the point where a lesson is learned and you learn how to cope with bad or rude players in other games that you play.
Haunce (NA)
: Allow me to paint a picture. You load into a game and you state "my dad is a lawyer" as a joke. Sivir immediately begins venting about how trash yuumi is and how she hates all yuumi players and how they're the scum of the earth. The sivir proceeds to do nothing but complain about how yuumi dies and dies again. You take a moment to look up yuumi and discover that the yuumi player is in bronze 1 Now if you reread the chat log, I think it gives you some context to the situation I was in.
> [{quoted}](name=Haunce,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=hWZP9Qs2,comment-id=0003000000000000,timestamp=2019-10-15T00:37:24.163+0000) > > Allow me to paint a picture. > > You load into a game and you state "my dad is a lawyer" as a joke. > Sivir immediately begins venting about how trash yuumi is and how she hates all yuumi players and how they're the scum of the earth. > The sivir proceeds to do nothing but complain about how yuumi dies and dies again. > You take a moment to look up yuumi and discover that the yuumi player is in bronze 1 > > Now if you reread the chat log, I think it gives you some context to the situation I was in. In a bit of fairness, when yuumi came out nobody understood her for how different she is to any other champion; to this day i still sometimes see people banning her not wanting them on their team rather than not wanting the opposition to pick them. In spite of this she gets nerfed regularly because she's so good in pro play. That being said, the context of your situation doesn't really change anything. Were they behaving well? Not really. But like has been said before, the appropriate response is to mute them, and report them after the game. You didn't do that. Instead, you reacted aggressively, thus exposing yourself to possible punishment. If you value your $1500 account, you would have chosen your actions with a little more care.
Haunce (NA)
: https://imgur.com/a/Xp9OERl
> [{quoted}](name=Haunce,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=hWZP9Qs2,comment-id=00010001,timestamp=2019-10-15T00:10:01.529+0000) > > https://imgur.com/a/Xp9OERl that support ticket indicates you've been reported in 25% of your games. That's a pretty high rate. Not all reports have grounds, some people report just because they're mad, but that is a lot of reported games. It sounds to me like you have a pattern of getting upset in games. You really need to find a strategy for staying cool.
Haunce (NA)
: Without context, I can see why you would think that. That's why I think it's trash that the chat logs we receive are only of the things we said and viewed in a vacuum. The point you're making is exactly what I'm upset about.
> [{quoted}](name=Haunce,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=hWZP9Qs2,comment-id=00020001000000000000,timestamp=2019-10-15T00:34:48.651+0000) > > Without context, I can see why you would think that. That's why I think it's trash that the chat logs we receive are only of the things we said and viewed in a vacuum. The point you're making is exactly what I'm upset about. Context rarely changes the outcome of reports. I've seen many people come on this forum and provide context with their actions, and it does get reviewed, but rarely is there a valid excuse for bad chat.
Haunce (NA)
: Yes that was a big mistake on my end. I alluded to it in the main post that I used to be toxic, however I was never punished when the tribunal system was utilized as it gave players context of the situation at hand. I used to say hurtful things to people who flamed myself and others. I don't diss people who play poorly, only those who make rude comments. I didn't call sivir bad. I pointed out that she was trolling, and she was. She was trolling a 35 minute game because someone chose a character she didn't like.
> [{quoted}](name=Haunce,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=hWZP9Qs2,comment-id=00030000,timestamp=2019-10-15T00:22:10.106+0000) > > Yes that was a big mistake on my end. > > I alluded to it in the main post that I used to be toxic, however I was never punished when the tribunal system was utilized as it gave players context of the situation at hand. I used to say hurtful things to people who flamed myself and others. I don't diss people who play poorly, only those who make rude comments. > > I didn't call sivir bad. I pointed out that she was trolling, and she was. She was trolling a 35 minute game because someone chose a character she didn't like. Do you have any idea how many times I've been called "trolling" when I was playing my best? It is rude and an insult. And, calling out an actual troll isn't going to get them to stop. You're wasting your time calling people out. Just report them after the game if you're confident they did something wrong. Then they might get in trouble, and you definitely won't. BTW, picking an off meta champ or playing them in a position that isn't typical doesn't automatically make them trolling. Many champions have found success outside of the areas they were tailored to succeed in. Of course, it doesn't always work, but that doesn't mean they were intentionally trying to sabotage your game, which is what the definition of trolling is. You have to demonstrate intent to be a troll.
Haunce (NA)
: I just genuinely don't see (and if you had context it would be of benefit to me) how I was being toxic in this game. I specifically tailored my messages to be not toxic. I didn't call the sivir player many of the names i would have in the past, but chose to call her a child.
> [{quoted}](name=Haunce,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=hWZP9Qs2,comment-id=000200010000,timestamp=2019-10-15T00:23:53.125+0000) > > I just genuinely don't see (and if you had context it would be of benefit to me) how I was being toxic in this game. I specifically tailored my messages to be not toxic. I didn't call the sivir player many of the names i would have in the past, but chose to call her a child. Well, if you were reported, it was probably under the "Negative attitude" heading, which wouldn't be far off. Again though, even if it seems like a minor incident, it apparently isn't your first one or you wouldn't have received a ban. This sort of thing would usually yield a chat restriction.
Haunce (NA)
: Additionally I would like to point out that if you said this as a response in game and I reported you for it, it would be considered festering a negative environment as you chose to post a differing comment from me vice moving on with your life.
> [{quoted}](name=Haunce,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=hWZP9Qs2,comment-id=00010002,timestamp=2019-10-15T00:17:11.630+0000) > > Additionally I would like to point out that if you said this as a response in game and I reported you for it, it would be considered festering a negative environment as you chose to post a differing comment from me vice moving on with your life. Why can't you accept responsibility for your error instead of deflect it? Also the word you're looking for is "fostering" not "festering," which has a different meaning entirely. Just an FYI.
Haunce (NA)
: By posting a comment like this, you are displaying the exact same behavior that I did in the game that resulted in my ban.
> [{quoted}](name=Haunce,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=hWZP9Qs2,comment-id=000200000000,timestamp=2019-10-15T00:19:10.613+0000) > > By posting a comment like this, you are displaying the exact same behavior that I did in the game that resulted in my ban. Not really. You aren't his team mate and he isn't berating you for your poor play. Because he's right, if you got a permaban off this, it's because you have multiple previous violations. It's not to insult you, it's simply a fact.
Haunce (NA)
: I have been a dedicated player for over 10 years and have spent over $1515 enjoying this game. My attempts at defending myself and other players from toxic players has been deemed inappropriate and now I no longer get to play. I made no death threats. I made no hate comments. All I did was actively point out another player's childish behavior and because of that I don't get to play this game.
> [{quoted}](name=Haunce,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=hWZP9Qs2,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2019-10-15T00:04:17.499+0000) > > I have been a dedicated player for over 10 years and have spent over $1515 enjoying this game. My attempts at defending myself and other players from toxic players has been deemed inappropriate and now I no longer get to play. I made no death threats. I made no hate comments. All I did was actively point out another player's childish behavior and because of that I don't get to play this game. Spending money doesn't shield you from poor behavior.
Haunce (NA)
: The automated ban system
" attempting to show her her flawed logic seemed like the most beneficial use of my time at that point. " Spoiler alert: It wasn't. If you think someone is being stupid or making no sense. That's fine. But you don't tell them that and try to tell them that they are or why they're stupid. you should have done exactly what you said you should have done- muted them and moved on. Telling people they're bad doesn't help them improve, and arguing with someone who may not have a sense of logic isn't going to change them. There are much better things you could do with your time.
Comentários de Rioters
: it's the same difficulty to get to gold 4 IMO, maybe easier - but the community is way worse this season, damage is super high so there's an insane feeder or ....4...in every game
> [{quoted}](name=Watch Top Int,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=KAOEGWab,comment-id=0004,timestamp=2019-10-11T02:11:05.454+0000) > > it's the same difficulty to get to gold 4 IMO, maybe easier - but the community is way worse this season, damage is super high so there's an insane feeder or ....4...in every game Definitely some truth in that. At least in twisted treeline, I'm limited to having at most two other toxic players on my team XD
Kalienor (EUW)
: > Since player distribution across hte divisions hasn't really changed much It changed a lot actually. Gold was the top 35% mark and now about 50% players are above Gold 4. So, it probably was intentional, but in the opposite direction you think it went ^^. > (although it is for me since my performance would have earned me gold in the past and now it won't) It can be caused by your level stagnating while the other's increasing. Having more players Gold+ and leaving you behind can mean people are just getting better at the game faster than you. I got the problem with TFT: in the first weeks, I was extremely strong, but I failed to adapt and now I'm below average. My playstyle didn't change, but the others got better than me.
> [{quoted}](name=Kalienor,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=KAOEGWab,comment-id=0003,timestamp=2019-10-11T02:08:02.583+0000) > > It changed a lot actually. Gold was the top 35% mark and now about 50% players are above Gold 4. > > So, it probably was intentional, but in the opposite direction you think it went ^^. > > It can be caused by your level stagnating while the other's increasing. Having more players Gold+ and leaving you behind can mean people are just getting better at the game faster than you. > I got the problem with TFT: in the first weeks, I was extremely strong, but I failed to adapt and now I'm below average. My playstyle didn't change, but the others got better than me. So what you're telling me is I suck more than I used to. That makes me feel so much better :p (But again, i've been playing a lot of non meta champions so its probably more failing in champ select than anywhere else) You do have a point. As noted, the size of iron is actually really small. I've been assuming that it would eventually get larger as more new players enter the system (pretty much all existing players started higher than iron), but if that is happening, its been happening crazy slow. So I guess my logic may have been flawed. I guess I just need to bandwagon onto the popular stuff. I have the basic skills and such, but I think I'm bad at champ select.
: Was it intended to make Gold a higher achievement with the league restructuring?
All that really means is people within the same tier are closer together, but that's really just because each tier is smaller. But again, as I said, a side effect of this is the minimum threshold for the ranked rewards is higher than it originally was, which is what I was talking about. So the question remains, is this just a side effect or was that specifically planned?
Comentários de Rioters
: Why did you get 2000 RP? Wtf, i didn't even get the 125 RP i asked for when i sent in a drawing of Trundle!
> [{quoted}](name=Blessed By RNG,realm=EUW,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=T8QRLxdZ,comment-id=0010,timestamp=2019-10-02T09:40:23.764+0000) > > Why did you get 2000 RP? Wtf, i didn't even get the 125 RP i asked for when i sent in a drawing of Trundle! probably just to be nice to somebody who felt like promises were being broken. In my case though, I wouldn't want more than I asked for because the whole point was to be able to get my balance to zero. :p
: Oi! Not the Rioter involved at all. But you should have enough to get that and something else (You might have to relog though. I also heartily recommend the new Morgana skin because...well, I'm biased ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ ) Go forth and be an artist! Or root enemies for a few years. (Still biased).
> [{quoted}](name=Morgageddon,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=T8QRLxdZ,comment-id=000d,timestamp=2019-10-02T01:20:02.012+0000) > > Oi! > > Not the Rioter involved at all. > > But you should have enough to get that and something else (You might have to relog though. I also heartily recommend the new Morgana skin because...well, I'm biased ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ ) > > Go forth and be an artist! Or root enemies for a few years. (Still biased). I admit I'm not much of an artist, but I had fun catering to my RIoter's wish. You guys miss the mark sometimes, but you definitely came through for me, and for this guy.
Horızen (NA)
: Player Support said they'd give me RP if I drew a picture for them- so I did and then nope.
I did a sketch of aurelion sol purely for a few cents of RP so I could zero out my balance. They seemed to think it was worth more than that but granted exactly the wish I wanted. They don't ALWAYS deliver, but I think both they and I in this case delighted in having some fun come out of an annoying situation for me.
: Join Us Oct. 15th to Celebrate 10 Years of League
A large part of that concurrent players claim comes from the fact that you include regions where Steam doesn't do business.
: > [{quoted}](name=Tahngarthor,realm=NA,application-id=Ag8jgd8Q,discussion-id=HT1l3E8E,comment-id=00020000000000010000,timestamp=2019-08-28T02:23:53.851+0000) > > I never said it was a fact. Perhaps, but you never said it was just an opinion either. You just said "It's less fun"
> [{quoted}](name=ThatShinyPiplup,realm=NA,application-id=Ag8jgd8Q,discussion-id=HT1l3E8E,comment-id=000200000000000100000000,timestamp=2019-08-28T03:12:40.501+0000) > > Perhaps, but you never said it was just an opinion either. > You just said "It's less fun" I always treat everything on a discussion forum as opinion by default, unless it's something informational that's clearly meant to convey facts to someone in order to help them or something like that.
: Actually, this is great. If you could kindly round up all the others who hate it and also convince them to never play again that'd be great. Seems like every other match in TFT I get a handful of people just crying their eyes out. "It's RNG BS!" "Trash mode is trash" "Everybody just builds the same team, this is stupid, you're all garbage" It's a risky proposition because maybe that would kill the population and thus the mode, but I'd take the risk if there's a potential I can stop reading complaints from people who have no interest in the mode, but keep showing up game after game, or in comments and on boards, to annoy those that do.
> [{quoted}](name=j0kulhaups,realm=NA,application-id=Ag8jgd8Q,discussion-id=HT1l3E8E,comment-id=0002000000000002,timestamp=2019-08-28T02:30:58.460+0000) > > Actually, this is great. If you could kindly round up all the others who hate it and also convince them to never play again that'd be great. > > Seems like every other match in TFT I get a handful of people just crying their eyes out. "It's RNG BS!" "Trash mode is trash" "Everybody just builds the same team, this is stupid, you're all garbage" > > It's a risky proposition because maybe that would kill the population and thus the mode, but I'd take the risk if there's a potential I can stop reading complaints from people who have no interest in the mode, but keep showing up game after game, or in comments and on boards, to annoy those that do. Well, i'm happy to indirectly assist you. I'm not going to lie and say that I subconsciously wish the same thing every other game of 3v3. But to be frank, TFT is the reason 3v3 is going away. So I would admittedly not shed a tear if TFT died. I'm just really tired of things I enjoyed in the game being taken away. Riot always makes some BS excuse like "its too much resources for something that isnt popular, and to that I call BS- Riot makes stupidillion dollars a year, they can afford to keep TT in maintenance mode like they have for the last 4 years they've barely touched it, and it wouldn't hurt their bottom line in the slightest. Funny enough, Arena of Valor, which is also owned by Tencent like Riot/League is, doesn't seem to have a problem keeping less popular modes available. I wonder why one moba can do it and another far more successful one can't.
: > [{quoted}](name=Tahngarthor,realm=NA,application-id=Ag8jgd8Q,discussion-id=HT1l3E8E,comment-id=000200000000,timestamp=2019-08-28T01:50:48.435+0000) > > Becuase they can't be. > > They added a minigame, something that has basically nothing to do with the agme we all know and love whatsoever except for the theming, and was completely ripped off from another game that did the same thing, and somehow it becaome popular where game modes that were actually game modes that still resembled the main game in some way did not. It makes no sense to me and still doesn't. > > I'd rather play a game where you sort dog turds from cat doodies and that would still be more fun than TFT. But regardless, TFT is popular for reasons beyond my comprehension and thus I'll get downvoted to oblivion. > > Am I salty that something that was supposed to be an "experimental mode" was fast tracked to release and immediately given ranked and made permanent without even community feedback while a part of the game that I know and have loved for years despite being neglected gets deleted to make room for it? > > Yes. Yes I am, and I freely admit it. But even setting that aside, I don't find TFT fun and I won't play it again. That's great, don't play it. But it being less fun than other game modes is your opinion, not fact.
> [{quoted}](name=ThatShinyPiplup,realm=NA,application-id=Ag8jgd8Q,discussion-id=HT1l3E8E,comment-id=0002000000000001,timestamp=2019-08-28T02:22:11.583+0000) > > That's great, don't play it. But it being less fun than other game modes is your opinion, not fact. I never said it was a fact.
Ketr (NA)
: lol mad?
> [{quoted}](name=Ketr,realm=NA,application-id=Ag8jgd8Q,discussion-id=HT1l3E8E,comment-id=0002000000000000,timestamp=2019-08-28T02:08:08.363+0000) > > lol mad? Yep. And I'm not afraid to admit it.
: And they said opinions couldn't be wrong
> [{quoted}](name=ThatShinyPiplup,realm=NA,application-id=Ag8jgd8Q,discussion-id=HT1l3E8E,comment-id=00020000,timestamp=2019-08-27T23:35:19.325+0000) > > And they said opinions couldn't be wrong Becuase they can't be. They added a minigame, something that has basically nothing to do with the agme we all know and love whatsoever except for the theming, and was completely ripped off from another game that did the same thing, and somehow it becaome popular where game modes that were actually game modes that still resembled the main game in some way did not. It makes no sense to me and still doesn't. I'd rather play a game where you sort dog turds from cat doodies and that would still be more fun than TFT. But regardless, TFT is popular for reasons beyond my comprehension and thus I'll get downvoted to oblivion. Am I salty that something that was supposed to be an "experimental mode" was fast tracked to release and immediately given ranked and made permanent without even community feedback while a part of the game that I know and have loved for years despite being neglected gets deleted to make room for it? Yes. Yes I am, and I freely admit it. But even setting that aside, I don't find TFT fun and I won't play it again.
: TFT Update: Powerful Punch-Ups
still less fun than twisted treeline and dominion
Aamano (NA)
: Riot if youre not working on fun player engaging content then WHAT ARE YOU EVEN DOING
: I was banned for fraud
Almost nobody who gets banned thinks they deserve it. But, we're here to tell you you do. And also that you're a sucker for falling for it.
Comentários de Rioters
: Has anyone noticed how deathly quiet Riot has been since they announced Eternals?
Deleting TT might not be a big enough deal for people, but good luck sweeping this one under the rug, riot.
: Eternals: My Thoughts/Hopes for the Product.
My thought and hope is that it either ceases to exist or becomes a free, included feature with the game. It basically amounts to paying money on a per champion basis to get achievements, something pretty much every other game out there gives you for free.
: Riot: Nah. We stopped giving tokens on TT because we wanted to kill it off in the first place. This was our way of getting players out of TT to justify its removal. Enjoy our Eternals, where you can now have more stats tracked for your favorite champions at only 850 per champion!
> [{quoted}](name=Busty Demoness,realm=NA,application-id=yrc23zHg,discussion-id=xoqrV663,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2019-08-17T16:37:38.891+0000) > > Riot: Nah. We stopped giving tokens on TT because we wanted to kill it off in the first place. This was our way of getting players out of TT to justify its removal. Enjoy our Eternals, where you can now have more stats tracked for your favorite champions at only 850 per champion! yep. Just getting more moneygrabby with each passing day. Please shareholders above all else. Purchased achievements lol, I didn't believe it til i saw it.
Exibir mais

Tahngarthor

Nível 173 (NA)
Total de votos positivos
Criar uma discussão