This is actually.... super interesting. It would be super cool if in-lore they ended up having to spend time with each other as a necessity because I don't think they would get along at all. But as time went on I think they would find they have much more in common than they would think

I didn't get a 14-day ban for being passive aggressive. I was banned for player abuse, outlines in the reform card. Of which I was not. Please point out what I edited, as I'm not aware of it myself :) Also, I do get to make a determination of the ban being incorrect or not. Based on rules provided by Riot, I can use deductive reasoning to conclude that the ban is not correct and I do not deserve it. Whether or not Riot will hold themselves to the standards their rules set is another matter.

I didn’t say that at all. I just said that I conduct myself as I would on any other platform. Is that difficult to understand for you?

What opinion did I present that you interpreted as a fact and what makes you think that Riot dictates what is right or wrong because of who they ban?

Hate speech is targeted speech. My speech was absolutely not targeted. Just using those words isn’t racist or homophobic in any capacity.

Oh, can you link me the information about Zero Tolerance words please? :D

I'm just talking in general, it's nothing to do with my suspension.

I actually have read the terms and conditions! It's mostly the same as any other platform, it provides very ambiguous terms of which could be used to justify any ban they would like to throw out. This isn't a jab at Riot in particular, it's just a very common occurrence with platforms.

Also, I don't think that it's illogical to use these words in the context I did at all. I conducted myself how I would on any platform, like on Twitch, of which League of Legends is incredibly popular. The use of these words as not targeted speech is not punishable at all

I'm not sure what you mean by "people like me" but nevertheless, I do not have the contextual understanding you seem to have. I started playing League of Legends in season 9 and do not have any experience with this. So perhaps that is why I don't know something that is "so well known".

I did, and they explained that the suspension is appropriately placed. I will be the first to admit that a punishment could be justified and I can take this as an opportunity to learn from my mistakes, however I do not think 14-day ban is justified based off of my comms alone!

Yeah just a mistake <3

I heavily agree with Kayle and Morgana not having a real explanation with what they've been doing all this time. This is a problem that some old characters have been suffering from, like Jax. 3000 years of doing nothing, just chilling lol.

Yep! Which is fun to talk about :) Stop being a wet blanket lol

I like prompting conversation, and sometimes Riot likes to step in and drop hints every now and again.

I know Zilean has many in a stasis that he will most likely be able to bring back in the future, but I mean Icathians that are like Jax

jinx is literally the only unique body types one. but she's still heavily sexualised

> mf's tits ... > my comment wasn't about sexualisation the point is mate, that when you're talking about money you will always also be talking about sexualisation. thats how riot markets their game

> Why would riot make that when it doesn't generate a profit, though? Even when she's strong, people aren't playing illaoi or buying skins from her. Meanwhile mf's tits have more animation time spent on them than zileans entire visuals. This isn't because riots artists are sitting there drooling over their artwork, it's because for the same amount of work (or less), they're making orders of magnitude more money.

It's a fact

You very much stretched it with the males there. Taric is the ONLY one I can accept.

Again, for like the 29th time, I have no problem with Riot producing sexy champions, re-read my post.

Every female you listed has almost identical body types and are all sexualised.

Again, this post had very little to do with sexualisation.

Very true! And I totally glossed over him.

Firstly, you have absolutely no understanding of post hoc ergo propter hoc. That informal logical fallacy has to do with causal relations, and is often along the lines of correlation =/= causation. Secondly, you're biologically illiterate. Muscle refers to muscle tissue, the distinction between the two is only the formation of entire muscle groups. My bicep is just a formation of muscle cells. > just because females have muscle tissue does not mean they have muscles. those are two different things. if you think they're not then you're not educated or mature enough to have this debate with. that's not meant to be an attack on you, but a fact that muscles as we call them versus muscle tissue is very different. I just lost every. single. one. of my braincells reading this comment. You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. > a female will never have the muscular structure that a male has. And? How is this relevant in any way? > it would require an entire overhaul of our physiological and genetic makeup for that to work and at that point no one alive would dare compare the two different species assuming humans as we know them now and humans as they would be then were both in mutual existence. I actually don't know what you're trying to say. You are spewing utter nonsense. Did you just say females are another species? LOL??? > i'm going to go out on a limb here and just assume that your understanding of what sexualization is is based solely on your lack of understanding and instead are trying to twist the buzz word into your own version for your own goals. Since you don't know basic definitions, here you go: > sex·​u·​al·​ize | \ ˈsek-sh(ə-)wə-ˌlīz , ˈsek-shə-ˌlīz\ sexualized; sexualizing Definition of sexualize transitive verb : to make apparent or exaggerate sexual features : endow with a sexual character or cast ... > reading your initial post you gave about wanting a dark and mysterious female instead of quiyana when we already have kaisa, morgana, vayne, evelynn, elise, diana, kalista, lissandra, leblanc, katarina, syndra, xayah, and zyra left me confused. but i tried to lean towards the idea of assassin. you said you wanted an assassin... if we ignore katarina, vayne, evelynn, diana, leblanc, and the spider half of elise... sure we don't have any dark brooding assassins. Every champion you just listed is heavily sexualised and not a single one is an AD assassin. You clearly DIDN'T re-read my initial post. > you don't put riot out on boobs, hips, muscles, and exposed skin. Here's a logical fallacy for you: straw man. I did not say this at all. >so the only logical conclusion? you want an emo/goth trap girl in a bodysuit because that's what fits your fetish. and that's fine. own it. no need to start a political march against riot because you're not being satisfied. but dont give me that crap about muscles not being sexual or that there aren't any brooding and dark girls in league. > it's almost 2020. barely anyone cares what you're into. if you want an emo femboy tell riot you want an emo femboy. they're popular in japan. i get it. annnndddd there goes the last of my brain cells. you're an incredibly disingenuous and ignorant.

It's a pop culture reference to Michael Jackson's dance in a "Billy Jean" musical performance lol

This post has nothing to do with the stuff you're talking about...? {{sticker:zombie-brand-mindblown}}

Agreed! :)

Oh my bad. I forgot females don't have muscles LMAO?????? Even so, I know what you're trying to say. But you fundementally don't understand what sexualisation is in the context of an art form. Please re-read my comment, > "A sexualized art style is a form that specifically focuses and often exaggerates/puts focus on sexually suggestive features."

{{champion:131}} {{champion:420}} {{champion:113}} Are pretty much the only champs I can accept from your list. Sexualization wasn't the main point of this post dude. I knew this would happen. I mention it off hand and the only comments I get are about it.

yeah I don't disagree with anything you've said. on the money. i gotta make sure to point out that i'm not saying anything risky because people are known on the boards to be a bit... sensitive

I'm talking about human champions! And just because a champion has muscles doesn't make them sexualized. A sexualized art style is a form that specifically focuses and often exaggerates/puts focus on sexually suggestive features. Talon and Zed are very much covered from head to toe in armor and clothing.

That's him millennia after being imprisoned. As an ascended, his arc would have mirrored his corruption.

How is it tokenization? Did you read the comics at all? They clearly have two very distinct personalities. Patriotic navori warriors who fought in the Noxian war. One is enveloped with revenge and spite at what the Noxian invaders did to his lover, the other protective and loving, wanting nothing more than to turn away from hatred and revenge.

I disagree, he was a grieving husband and father, which warped him into a monster. His humanity was forsaken and turned himself into something horrifying

Not to mention VARUS WAS A (presumably) STRAIGHT GUY AND HAD A WIFE + AN ENTIRE FAMILY. People gotta stop saying that Varus' character was entirely changed, when it really wasn't.

He's not really hung up on it, just something to point out. Nothing wrong with that

Well if the map is anything to go off of, we roughly only see 1/4 of Runeterra as a whole. Perhaps this is something that will be explored in the future.

I wouldn't be too worried friend, skin lines rarely reflect canon relationships. I understand your speculation but again there's nothing to worry about! :)